- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:09:46 -0500
- To: public-linked-json@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5112642A.5010403@openlinksw.com>
On 2/5/13 11:47 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > > I encourage you to use hash URIs. You can cross reference these URIs > in a manner that unveils the broader utility of Linked Data and shared > vocabularies etc.. > > We will continue to use simple slash URIs for schema.org > <http://schema.org> terms, as we do for the type URIs. > > Dan > > ps. +1 to having some examples that use multiple vocabularies > My hash URI reference was about guidance for making simple examples that don't open up a can of worms re. identifiers, identity, and denotation (aka. HttpRange-14). Thus, in my guidance case I mean: cross reference your simple hash URIs to URIs from shared vocabularies such as Schema.org, FOAF etc.. Net effect, zero distractions. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 14:10:13 UTC