- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:08:01 -0500
- To: W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: JSON-LD CG <public-linked-json@w3.org>
On 02/24/2013 02:25 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > This blog post prominently includes blank nodes for predicates, which > I don't think was discussed on the call last week. It wasn't discussed on the call last week, but it has been discussed before with members of the RDF WG: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/JSON-LD_Data_Model I'm not asking the group to re-visit that decision, just documenting that it faces similar issues. The non-optimial solution is the same as the one proposed for blank node identifiers for graphs. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2013 21:08:35 UTC