- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:55:14 +0100
- To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> There is a vCard in RDF document: > > http://www.w3.org/Submission/vcard-rdf/ Oh OK.. so there's also a newer version. I've referenced http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-vcard-rdf-20010222/. One of the first reactions was that it doesn't support vCard 4.0 (which also the doc you reference doesn't). > and, afaik, Renato wants to referesh it, too. Perhaps you should share that directly on apps-discuss. > JSON-LD is an RDF serialization. Ie, putting the RDF representation > into JSON-LD does not need a new standard... That's true. The only problem arises when you want to process that data also as plain old JSON. In that case you have to define some constraints (e.g. the field names to be used) so that the context doesn't have to be evaluated by those clients. Our "profile" media type parameter addresses that issue. So all you would have to do to also support plain JSON clients, is to define those restrictions somewhere, assign it an IRI and put it into that parameter. > There has been discussion on iCalendar in RDF, too: > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/RdfCalendarDocumentation > > although, somehow, the community never came around to have something as > clearly described as vCard in RDF. But the same thing hold: any RDF > vocabulary can be described in JSON-LD, so there is no need for a new > standard in my view... Thanks for the background infos Ivan. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 12:55:46 UTC