- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:14:30 -0500
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
- CC: JSON-LD CG <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Hi all, The JSON-LD CG approved[1] the JSON-LD 1.0 publication as a 2nd Final Community Group Specification last week. The document can be found here: http://json-ld.org/spec/FCGS/json-ld-syntax/20130222/ The editors feel that the document is ready to go into Last Call with the following caveats: 1. It needs to be reviewed by the RDF WG so that we can be sure that it is in line with the expectations of the group. 2. The sub-optimal solution to the blank node identifiers for graph names issue needs to be reviewed by the RDF WG. 3. The property generator feature should be marked as an at-risk feature requiring feedback during LC review. 4. We may want to put in an issue marker noting that we may introduce @base functionality if Jeremy Carroll's use case is compelling. Or we may want to put the feature in there and mark it as at-risk. David, Guus, could you please make sure to spend a bit of time on the next call asking for a couple of reviews from RDF WG members before we go into LC? -- manu PS: This does not include the JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API document, we're still working on getting the last of the CG comments addressed in that spec. -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2013 22:15:00 UTC