RE: Use FOAF or schema.org in examples? from Markus Lanthaler on 2013-02-06 (public-linked-json@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:47:57 +0100
To: <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009801ce0446$aa386ed0$fea94c70$@lanthaler@gmx.net>

> Putting schema.org stuff into the JSON-LD 1.0 spec is mostly a
> marketing
> move. This was done so folks understand that this stuff works with
> schema.org. Web developers are really excited about it because of the
> enhanced search results, but I still have a number of reservations
> about
> the one-vocab-to-rule-them-all approach. I share most of Dave Lehn's
> concerns, so I don't think we should remove other non-schema.org
> examples to show a good balance of vocabulary mixing with JSON-LD.

OK, sounds reasonable.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 08:48:29 UTC