public-ldp-wg@w3.org from September 2012 by date

Sunday, 30 September 2012

• Re: UC: Evolving people/project information Ashok Malhotra
• UC: Evolving people/project information Andy Seaborne

Friday, 28 September 2012

• Re: Agenda for October 1, 2012 Olivier Berger
• ldp-ISSUE-8 (Removing Profile): Better define or just not use the "Basic profile" terminology [Linked Data Platform core] LDP
• Re: Explaining the "semantics" of the HTTP methods Raúl García Castro
• Adressing more error cases ? Olivier Berger
• Explaining the "semantics" of the HTTP methods Olivier Berger
• RE: Multiple representations of the same resource without content negotiation Armin.Haller@csiro.au
• Re: Agenda for October 1, 2012 Michael Hausenblas
• Agenda for October 1, 2012 Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

• TPAC Lyon meeting for WebID, RWW & Social Web community groups Henry Story

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

• ldp-ISSUE-7 (Container operations): What operations are permittered on conatiners and how do they get invoked? [Linked Data Platform core] LDP

Monday, 24 September 2012

• Re: Controlling datatypes Bart van Leeuwen
• Fwd: W3C LDP UC&R schedule steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
• Re: ISSUE-6 test Wilde, Erik
• Re: ISSUE-6 test David Wood
• W3C LDP UC&R schedule Steve K Speicher
• Re: Multiple representations of the same resource without content negotiation Wilde, Erik
• Draft minutes of September 24, 2012 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Multiple representations of the same resource without content negotiation Wilde, Erik
• Re: Published in IEEE Internet Computing : "ArRESTed Development: Guidelines for Designing REST Frameworks" Steve K Speicher
• Re: Multiple representations of the same resource without content negotiation Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-6 test Arnaud Le Hors
• ISSUE-6 test Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Steve K Speicher
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Steve K Speicher
• Operations on containers Andy Seaborne
• Multiple representations of the same resource without content negotiation Armin.Haller@csiro.au

Sunday, 23 September 2012

• Re: agenda for next monday Kevin Page

Saturday, 22 September 2012

• TPAC RWW & WebID - room problem resolved Henry Story

Friday, 21 September 2012

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-6 (User-defined simple types): Should LDBP say that any kind of user-defined simple data type is disallowed? [Linked Data Platform core] Wilde, Erik
• Re: Registering for F2F1 Serena Villata
• Re: Seems like LDP should have a presence on W3C's general "LINKED DATA" page Andy Seaborne
• Re: Seems like LDP should have a presence on W3C's general "LINKED DATA" page Ivan Herman
• Re: Controlling datatypes Henry Story
• Re: Controlling datatypes Christophe Guéret
• TPAC Plenary Wednesday - rww/ldp & webid Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-6 (User-defined simple types): Should LDBP say that any kind of user-defined simple data type is disallowed? [Linked Data Platform core] Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Andy Seaborne
• Re: Controlling datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Controlling datatypes Christophe Guéret

Thursday, 20 September 2012

• agenda for next monday Wilde, Erik
• Re: Controlling datatypes Wilde, Erik
• ldp-ISSUE-6 (User-defined simple types): Should LDBP say that any kind of user-defined simple data type is disallowed? [Linked Data Platform core] LDP
• ldp-ISSUE-5 (Relation/Alignment with GSP): Add a section explaining how LDBP is related to GSP [Linked Data Platform core] LDP
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-4 (XSD simple type URIs): Are the XSD simple types indeed identified by the URIs listed in section 4.1.9 [Linked Data Platform core] Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-4 (XSD simple type URIs): Are the XSD simple types indeed identified by the URIs listed in section 4.1.9 [Linked Data Platform core] Gavin Carothers
• ldp-ISSUE-4 (XSD simple type URIs): Are the XSD simple types indeed identified by the URIs listed in section 4.1.9 [Linked Data Platform core] LDP
• Re: TPAC 2012 - looking for sponsors for RWW & WebID Community Groups Henry Story
• RE: TPAC 2012 - looking for sponsors for RWW & WebID Community Groups Emmanuel Dreux
• Re: Seems like LDP should have a presence on W3C's general "LINKED DATA" page Bernadette Hyland
• Re: Seems like LDP should have a presence on W3C's general "LINKED DATA" page Arnaud Le Hors
• TPAC Plenary Session Henry Story
• Re: Seems like LDP should have a presence on W3C's general "LINKED DATA" page Michael Hausenblas
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Seems like LDP should have a presence on W3C's general "LINKED DATA" page David Wood
• Seems like LDP should have a presence on W3C's general "LINKED DATA" page Steve K Speicher
• Controlling datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Steve K Speicher
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Ashok Malhotra
• ldp-ISSUE-3 (BPC Versioning): Do BPC versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? LDP
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Andy Seaborne
• ldp-ISSUE-2 (BPR versioning): Do BPR versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? [Linked Data Platform core] LDP
• Re: ACTION-10: First Editor's Draft is available! Michael Hausenblas

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-10: First Editor's Draft is available! Steve K Speicher
• Re: ACTION-12: Define Turtle as the required serialization format for LDP -- COMPLETED Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ACTION-10: First Editor's Draft is available! Arnaud Le Hors
• ACTION-12: Define Turtle as the required serialization format for LDP -- COMPLETED Steve K Speicher
• ACTION-10: First Editor's Draft is available! Steve K Speicher

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

• Re: Registering for F2F1 Christophe Guéret

Monday, 17 September 2012

• Minutes of 2012-09-17 meeting John Arwe
• Re: Registering for F2F1 David Wood
• Re: ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Registering for F2F1 Alexandre Bertails
• Registering for F2F1 Sandro Hawke
• ACTION-4: Review SPARQL Graph Store Protocol and suggest how we should move forward with it Steve K Speicher
• Re: 9/17 LDP WG meeting agenda available Yrjana Rankka

Friday, 14 September 2012

• Re: ACTION-11: Define a timeline for working on the editor's draft and the FPWD Steve K Speicher
• Re: 9/17 LDP WG meeting agenda available Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-11: Define a timeline for working on the editor's draft and the FPWD Michael Hausenblas

Thursday, 13 September 2012

• 9/17 LDP WG meeting agenda available Erik Wilde
• ACTION-11: Define a timeline for working on the editor's draft and the FPWD Erik Wilde

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Ashok Malhotra

Monday, 10 September 2012

• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Ashok Malhotra
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Alexandre Bertails
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Andy Seaborne
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Alexandre Bertails
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Steve K Speicher
• Turtle Review Gavin Carothers
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Henry Story
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Alexandre Bertails
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Henry Story
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Ashok Malhotra
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Henry Story
• RE: Re : Betr: regrets for September 10, 2012 John.Domingue
• Minutes of 2012-09-10 meeting Michael Hausenblas
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Andy Seaborne
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Ashok Malhotra
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Steve K Speicher
• Re: LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Kingsley Idehen
• LDP user story: sharing binary resources and metadata Henry Story
• Re : Betr: regrets for September 10, 2012 Serena Villata
• Betr: regrets for September 10, 2012 Bart van Leeuwen
• Re: regrets for September 10, 2012 Christophe Guéret
• regrets for September 10, 2012 Ruben Verborgh

Thursday, 6 September 2012

• agenda for next monday's LDP WG meeting Erik Wilde

Monday, 3 September 2012

• Proposed Use Case 1: Retrieve RDF representation of a BPR Steve Battle
• Published in IEEE Internet Computing : "ArRESTed Development: Guidelines for Designing REST Frameworks" Olivier Berger

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2012 22:36:54 UTC