- From: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:37:27 +0200
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Hi. I've read the editor's draft again, and I'd like to point out a problem with the following excerpt : 4.3 HTTP POST There are no additional requirements on HTTP POST for BPRs. 4.4 HTTP PUT I'm a bit short on how to implement that ;-) No additional requirements, compared to ? Maybe one needs to have fully read other HTTP specs before, which shouldn't be repeated in LDBP, but I fear we are a bit short on explaining when to use PUT vs POST for instance. More generally, shouldn't one sentence be repeated for each of the BPR methods to explain that they are used for retrieval, modification, removal, etc ? I'm not sure this is worth creating an issue in the tracker. Hope this helps. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 14:37:56 UTC