- From: Bart van Leeuwen <Bart_van_Leeuwen@netage.nl>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:38:54 +0200
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 20:41:18 UTC
Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 21-09-2012 12:00:21: > From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> > To: Christophe Guéret <c.d.m.gueret@vu.nl>, > Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-ldp- > wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> > Date: 21-09-2012 12:01 > Subject: Re: Controlling datatypes > I certainly think one should avoid making datatypes if possible, and > indeed one should avoid inventing vocabulary if possible. But I am > not sure why we need to specify something along those lines in this > document... But let me get to reading it carefully. I'm following the discussion with the same mind set, I've been going over the section in the spec, and I couldn't really find a motivation for this limitation. I'm sure the original authors had very good reasons for it, so I would like to know more about those reasons. Bart van Leeuwen
Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 20:41:18 UTC