- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:34:19 +0100
- To: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Steve, > I have completed ACTION-10 to convert member submission to an Editor's Draft [1]. Thank you very much, indeed, for setting the ball rolling! > - What namespace URI should we use for new terms defined in this document? Proposal in document, we might want to raise an issue. For short: http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp# > Fellow editors (Michael/John), once you have contributed an edit feel free to add yourself as an editor. Done. > Note: the diff [3] isn't perfect, for example the new draft uses ReSpec.js which pulls in boilerplate HTML and the diff struggles with this a bit. My colleague Richard has developed a great diff tool (he's RDF WG and RDB2RDF WG Editor and fiddled around with it quite a while IIRC). Richard? > Note: [1] and [3] have an annoying red box at the top right since biblio > entries are missing, I have a pull request pending [4]. Robin says he'll > get to it shortly. OMG, I should have read your message more carefully. I did the same now for [[LINKED-DATA]] … well, I guess that will help Robin to determine a better CD algorithm ;) /me ducks Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel.: +353 91 495730 http://mhausenblas.info/ On 19 Sep 2012, at 20:17, Steve K Speicher wrote: > I have completed ACTION-10 to convert member submission to an Editor's > Draft [1]. > > This is an "as-is" migration from member submission [2] to follow W3C > draft format. I have also produced a HTML diff [3]. > > There are a few editorial items I need to address: > - What namespace URI should we use for new terms defined in this document? > - Validate the shortname for this as 'ldbp' > I assume these will either be created as official issues or actions. For > now I just made a reminder for editors in the doc. > > Now that ACTION-10 is complete, I will start incorporating some of the > actions and minor editorial issues found since published as member > submission. > > Fellow editors (Michael/John), once you have contributed an edit feel free > to add yourself as an editor. > > Note: the diff [3] isn't perfect, for example the new draft uses ReSpec.js > which pulls in boilerplate HTML and the diff struggles with this a bit. > Note: [1] and [3] have an annoying red box at the top right since biblio > entries are missing, I have a pull request pending [4]. Robin says he'll > get to it shortly. > > [1] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldbp.html > [2] - http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/SUBM-ldbp-20120326/ > [3] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldbp-diff-20120919.html > [4] - https://github.com/darobin/respec/pull/73 > > Thanks, > Steve Speicher > IBM Rational Software > OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> > http://open-services.net > >
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 07:34:48 UTC