W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > September 2012

Re: ACTION-10: First Editor's Draft is available!

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:34:19 +0100
Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <2B00FE92-9830-44DC-BFC8-D1614CEC44D6@deri.org>
To: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard.cyganiak@deri.org>
Steve,

> I have completed ACTION-10 to convert member submission to an Editor's Draft [1].

Thank you very much, indeed, for setting the ball rolling!


> - What namespace URI should we use for new terms defined in this document?

Proposal in document, we might want to raise an issue. For short: http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp# 


> Fellow editors (Michael/John), once you have contributed an edit feel free to add yourself as an editor.

Done.


> Note: the diff [3] isn't perfect, for example the new draft uses ReSpec.js which pulls in boilerplate HTML and the diff struggles with this a bit.

My colleague Richard has developed a great diff tool (he's RDF WG and RDB2RDF WG Editor and fiddled around with it quite a while IIRC). Richard?


> Note: [1] and [3] have an annoying red box at the top right since biblio 
> entries are missing, I have a pull request pending [4].  Robin says he'll 
> get to it shortly.


OMG, I should have read your message more carefully. I did the same now for [[LINKED-DATA]]  well, I guess that will help Robin to determine a better CD algorithm ;)

/me ducks

Cheers,
	   Michael

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel.: +353 91 495730
http://mhausenblas.info/

On 19 Sep 2012, at 20:17, Steve K Speicher wrote:

> I have completed ACTION-10 to convert member submission to an Editor's 
> Draft [1].
> 
> This is an "as-is" migration from member submission [2] to follow W3C 
> draft format.  I have also produced a HTML diff [3].
> 
> There are a few editorial items I need to address:
> - What namespace URI should we use for new terms defined in this document?
> - Validate the shortname for this as 'ldbp'
> I assume these will either be created as official issues or  actions.  For 
> now I just made a reminder for editors in the doc.
> 
> Now that ACTION-10 is complete,  I will start incorporating some of the 
> actions and minor editorial issues found since published as member 
> submission.
> 
> Fellow editors (Michael/John), once you have contributed an edit feel free 
> to add yourself as an editor.
> 
> Note: the diff [3] isn't perfect, for example the new draft uses ReSpec.js 
> which pulls in boilerplate HTML and the diff struggles with this a bit.
> Note: [1] and [3] have an annoying red box at the top right since biblio 
> entries are missing, I have a pull request pending [4].  Robin says he'll 
> get to it shortly.
> 
> [1] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldbp.html
> [2] - http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/SUBM-ldbp-20120326/
> [3] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldbp-diff-20120919.html
> [4] - https://github.com/darobin/respec/pull/73
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
> http://open-services.net
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 07:34:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:31 UTC