shapes-ISSUE-123 (DirectType syntax): Shall we unify the syntax of sh:directType and sh:class? [SHACL - Core]
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 25 February 2016
SHACL implementation on RDFUnit
Filter handling on the metamodel
RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 25 February 2015
ACTION-32: Formal Specification
ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up
ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel
ISSUE-105: Updated proposals
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 February 2016
shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119)
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016
ISSUE-47: New proposal
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 February 2016
Comments on commenting
Summarizing results of yesterday's call
ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec.
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec.
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec.
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec.
shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec]
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 February 2016
Europeana tests of SHACL
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 February 2016
shapes-ISSUE-121 (# in graph name): Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character [SHACL Spec]
AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon.
ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon.
- Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon.
- Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon.