W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > February 2016

public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from February 2016 by date

Monday, 29 February 2016
- Re: SHACL implementation on RDFUnit Dimitris Kontokostas
Sunday, 28 February 2016
- Re: SHACL implementation on RDFUnit Holger Knublauch
- shapes-ISSUE-123 (DirectType syntax): Shall we unify the syntax of sh:directType and sh:class? [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Saturday, 27 February 2016
- Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity Karen Coyle
- Re: SHACL implementation on RDFUnit Dimitris Kontokostas
Friday, 26 February 2016
- RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 25 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
- SHACL implementation on RDFUnit Dimitris Kontokostas
- Re: Filter handling on the metamodel Dimitris Kontokostas
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Holger Knublauch
Thursday, 25 February 2016
- Re: Filter handling on the metamodel Holger Knublauch
- Filter handling on the metamodel Dimitris Kontokostas
- RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 25 February 2015 Arnaud Le Hors
Wednesday, 24 February 2016
- Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity Karen Coyle
- SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up Jim Amsden
- Re: ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up Holger Knublauch
- ACTION-32: Formal Specification Arthur Ryman
- ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up Arthur Ryman
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Holger Knublauch
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Holger Knublauch
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Arthur Ryman
Tuesday, 23 February 2016
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Irene Polikoff
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Karen Coyle
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Arthur Ryman
- ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel Holger Knublauch
Sunday, 21 February 2016
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 February 2016 Arthur Ryman
Friday, 19 February 2016
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Holger Knublauch
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Dimitris Kontokostas
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Holger Knublauch
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- ISSUE-105: Updated proposals Holger Knublauch
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Holger Knublauch
Thursday, 18 February 2016
- Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
- shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 Eric Prud'hommeaux
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 Holger Knublauch
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. Arthur Ryman
Wednesday, 17 February 2016
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 Holger Knublauch
- RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Tuesday, 16 February 2016
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] Jim Amsden
Monday, 15 February 2016
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. Holger Knublauch
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman
Friday, 12 February 2016
- ISSUE-47: New proposal Holger Knublauch
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. Holger Knublauch
Thursday, 11 February 2016
- RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
- Comments on commenting Karen Coyle
- Re: Summarizing results of yesterday's call Arthur Ryman
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. Arthur Ryman
- Summarizing results of yesterday's call Simon Steyskal
- Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. Iovka Boneva
- ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. Arthur Ryman
- Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Holger Knublauch
Wednesday, 10 February 2016
- shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 February 2016 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Tuesday, 9 February 2016
- Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Arthur Ryman
Monday, 8 February 2016
- Europeana tests of SHACL Karen Coyle
Sunday, 7 February 2016
- Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. Arthur Ryman
- Re: AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. Arthur Ryman
Saturday, 6 February 2016
- RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Friday, 5 February 2016
- Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. Karen Coyle
Thursday, 4 February 2016
- Re: AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. Holger Knublauch
- Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Holger Knublauch
- shapes-ISSUE-121 (# in graph name): Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
- AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. Simon Steyskal
- Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. Holger Knublauch
- ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. Arthur Ryman
- SHACL test traits seeded with ShEx traits Eric Prud'hommeaux
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 February 2016 Ted Thibodeau Jr
- Re: ISSUE-95: What should go into which Turtle file? Arthur Ryman
- Re: Any update on ISSUE-92? Arthur Ryman
- Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions Arthur Ryman
- Re: 3rd UCR WD published! Arthur Ryman
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 February 2016 Holger Knublauch
Wednesday, 3 February 2016
- RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 February 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Last message date: Monday, 29 February 2016 07:09:52 UTC
Archived on: Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:29 UTC

83 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Mail actions: [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:29 UTC