- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:41:50 -0500
- To: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Cc: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, Public-data-shapes Wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Simon, Thanks for the writeup. It is a good representation of the discussion. -- Arthur On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote: > Hi! > > I tried to capture all important bits and pieces of yesterday's call at [1]. > Feel free to edit/extend them whenever necessary (especially if I reported > them wrongly). > > cheers, > simon > > [1] > https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications#Meeting_minutes_SHACL_metamodel_discussion > > --- > DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal > Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna > > www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys > > Am 2016-02-11 06:32, schrieb Holger Knublauch: >> >> I had further thoughts on how to make all of us happier, and now propose >> >> >> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplifications#Proposal_3_.28edited_by_Holger.29 >> >> The main difference is that constraint types are now shapes, and >> sh:scopeClass is used instead of the new property sh:context. This >> meets all my requirements and avoids the metaclass/subclass issues. >> >> Comment appreciated. >> >> Holger
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 13:42:19 UTC