public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from February 2016 by subject

3rd UCR WD published!

ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up

ACTION-32: Formal Specification

Any update on ISSUE-92?

AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon.

Comments on commenting

Europeana tests of SHACL

Filter handling on the metamodel

ISSUE-105: Updated proposals

ISSUE-47: New proposal

ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec.

ISSUE-95 Discussions

ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel

ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon.

ISSUE-95: What should go into which Turtle file?

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 February 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 25 February 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 February 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 February 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 February 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 25 February 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 February 2016

SHACL implementation on RDFUnit

SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity

SHACL test traits seeded with ShEx traits

shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists

shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119)

shapes-ISSUE-121 (# in graph name): Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-123 (DirectType syntax): Shall we unify the syntax of sh:directType and sh:class? [SHACL - Core]

Summarizing results of yesterday's call

Last message date: Monday, 29 February 2016 07:09:52 UTC