Re: Any update on ISSUE-92?

Holger,

I spoke with Eric about this. He said he implemented this function in
ShEx and the results were encouraging. I'd like Eric to ask his ShEx
users/colleagues to confirm that this function is close enough for
practical purposes that if added to SHACL then SHACL would be
acceptable.

-- Arthur

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Holger Knublauch
<holger@topquadrant.com> wrote:
> I believe ISSUE-92 is the last major ticket that would impact the syntax of
> SHACL. Months ago Arthur had made a proposal using what he called
> partitioning. To me this sounds like the most realistic starting point for a
> compromise. The last time I looked the question was raised whether Arthur's
> design would cover the use cases from the ShEx proponents. Are there any
> news on this front, and how do we proceed with this issue?
>
> Thanks
> Holger
>
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Proposals#ISSUE-92:_additive_repeated_properties
>

Received on Thursday, 4 February 2016 16:23:29 UTC