public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from February 2016 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 25 February 2016 (Friday, 26 February)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 25 February 2015 (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Tuesday, 23 February)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 February 2016 (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (Wednesday, 17 February)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (Wednesday, 17 February)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 11 February 2016 (Thursday, 11 February)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 February 2016 (Wednesday, 10 February)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 4 February 2016 (Saturday, 6 February)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 February 2016 (Wednesday, 3 February)

Arthur Ryman

• ACTION-32: Formal Specification (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 18 February 2016 (Sunday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: Summarizing results of yesterday's call (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. (Thursday, 11 February)
• ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Tuesday, 9 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. (Sunday, 7 February)
• Re: AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. (Sunday, 7 February)
• ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: What should go into which Turtle file? (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: Any update on ISSUE-92? (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: 3rd UCR WD published! (Thursday, 4 February)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: SHACL implementation on RDFUnit (Monday, 29 February)
• Re: SHACL implementation on RDFUnit (Saturday, 27 February)
• SHACL implementation on RDFUnit (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Filter handling on the metamodel (Friday, 26 February)
• Filter handling on the metamodel (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Friday, 19 February)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (Thursday, 18 February)
• SHACL test traits seeded with ShEx traits (Thursday, 4 February)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: SHACL implementation on RDFUnit (Sunday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: Filter handling on the metamodel (Thursday, 25 February)
• Re: ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Wednesday, 24 February)
• ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Friday, 19 February)
• ISSUE-105: Updated proposals (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 18 February 2016 (Wednesday, 17 February)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 15 February)
• Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. (Monday, 15 February)
• ISSUE-47: New proposal (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. (Friday, 12 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Thursday, 11 February)
• Re: AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 Discussions (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. (Thursday, 4 February)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 February 2016 (Thursday, 4 February)

Iovka Boneva

• Re: ISSUE-92 sh:partition added to the spec. (Thursday, 11 February)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Tuesday, 23 February)

Jim Amsden

• Re: ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 16 February)

Karen Coyle

• Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: New proposal for metamodel (Tuesday, 23 February)
• Comments on commenting (Thursday, 11 February)
• Europeana tests of SHACL (Monday, 8 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. (Friday, 5 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity (Saturday, 27 February)
• Re: SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity (Wednesday, 24 February)
• SHACL syntax and metamodel complexity (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: ACTION-29 Recursion: Wrap Up (Wednesday, 24 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Friday, 19 February)
• Re: shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (ISSUE-99 and ISSUE-119) (Thursday, 18 February)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 February 2016 (Wednesday, 10 February)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-123 (DirectType syntax): Shall we unify the syntax of sh:directType and sh:class? [SHACL - Core] (Sunday, 28 February)
• shapes-ACTION-35: Proposal for lists (Thursday, 18 February)
• shapes-ISSUE-122 (no-shapes-file): Should we postpone publishing a SHACL shapes file (indefinitely)? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 10 February)
• shapes-ISSUE-121 (# in graph name): Should the SHACL owl:Ontology include the # character [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 4 February)

Simon Steyskal

• Summarizing results of yesterday's call (Thursday, 11 February)
• AW: Re: ISSUE-95: Proposal 1 Done. Invitation for telecon. (Thursday, 4 February)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Agenda for 4 February 2016 (Thursday, 4 February)

Last message date: Monday, 29 February 2016 07:09:52 UTC