- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:33:14 -0800
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
At the DCMI meeting this morning some members of the group who are familiar with the W3C process were nonnplussed to find that the comments list for SHACL comments does not follow the naming standards for W3C comments lists, which apparently usually have "-comments" in their title. They also were not happy that the original Shapes discussion list is being re-purposed, especially since the page for that list reads: "The public-rdf-shapes@w3.org mailing list is intended for follow-up from the RDF Validation Workshop; charter-bashing, idea-sharing, geeking about interface publication and validation. The workshop topics and report may provide additional useful context." The suggestion was that the header be changed to indicate that this is the list for official comments, so that users know that comments made here will be part of the W3C standards process. They also noted that the list has an archive of posts unrelated to SHACL, from the original purpose of the list. It may be good to put a date on the list documentation saying at what point it became a list for comments on SHACL. kc (aka: the messenger; do not shoot) -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 18:33:48 UTC