- From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:34:48 -0500
- To: <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
My understanding is that Arthur had a proposal documented as proposal 1 and Holger had a proposal documented as proposal 2. Arthur, Holger and Simon met and had a discussion documented on the wiki. As a result of this discussion, Holger withdrew proposal 2 and developed proposal 3 as an attempt to converge. Arthur has not made changes to the proposal 1 and it remains his proposal. Thus, the convergence wasnąt achieved. Thus, the request for involvement of the broader group. Irene Polikoff On 2/23/16, 5:23 PM, "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: >So now I admit to some confusion about the authorship and status of >proposal #3. Was this written by the three discussants, Holger, Arthur >and Simon? (In this case, "written by" would be that all three put their >names on the text as representing their views as co-authors.) > >kc > >On 2/23/16 10:50 AM, Arthur Ryman wrote: >> Arnaud, >> >> As Holger stated, we have not converged on a design. In order to break >> the deadlock, we need input from the working group. My proposal is >> [1], which is very minimalistic. If you can fit this into the agenda >> this week, I'd be happy to also walk though my proposal. >> >> [1] >>https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplificati >>ons#Proposal_1 >> >> -- Arthur >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Holger Knublauch >> <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote: >>> After quite some off-list discussions, here is a new proposal for the >>> metamodel: >>> >>> >>>https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/ISSUE-95:_Metamodel_simplificat >>>ions#Proposal_3 >>> >>> I believe this proposal addresses most of the concerns and >>>inefficiencies >>> (e.g. verbose AbstractXY classes) and was produced as a result of >>> discussions between Arthur, Simon and myself. However, I do not claim >>>that >>> all details of this proposal reflect their current view points. I >>>welcome >>> anyone's input on what aspects are not acceptable yet. >>> >>> Arnaud, I would be happy to explain this design to the group in the >>>next >>> call. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Holger >>> >>> >> >> > >-- >Karen Coyle >kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >m: 1-510-435-8234 >skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 >
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2016 23:35:22 UTC