www-ws-desc@w3.org from August 2004 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: Proposed resolution for issue 198 (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Issue 200 (Monday, 2 August)
• Proposed resolution for issue 199 (Monday, 2 August)
• Proposed resolution for issue 198 (Monday, 2 August)

Arthur Ryman

• RE: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Re: updating/verifying the URI refs section (appendix C) (Tuesday, 3 August)

Asir Vedamuthu

• RE: SOAP 11 Binding: Design Questions (Thursday, 26 August)
• SOAP 11 Binding and Modified Part 3 (Thursday, 26 August)
• RE: SOAP 11 Binding: Design Questions (Tuesday, 10 August)
• RE: SOAP 11 Binding: Strawman Proposal B (Tuesday, 10 August)
• SOAP 11 Binding: Design Questions (Monday, 2 August)
• Editorial: Issue 177 Implementation (Monday, 2 August)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Tuesday, 3 August)

David Booth

• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Friday, 6 August)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)
• FW: XMLP issue 489 (Tuesday, 10 August)

Hugo Haas

• WSDL 2.0 documents published as Last Call Working Drafts (Wednesday, 4 August)
• Re: Minor errors in Part 3 Bindings (Tuesday, 3 August)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: SOAP 11 Binding: Design Questions (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: SOAP 11 Binding: Design Questions (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: SOAP 11 Binding: Strawman Proposal B (Monday, 9 August)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Minor errors in Part 3 Bindings (Monday, 2 August)

Jonathan Marsh

• Agenda, 2 September 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 31 August)
• [Corrected] Minutes: 29 July 2004 telcon (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Summary, 2-4 Aug 2004 WSDescription WG FTF (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Minutes: 4 August 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Minutes: 3 August 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Tuesday, 24 August)
• [Corrected] Minutes: 2 August 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Apologies for minutes (Tuesday, 24 August)
• FW: Slides (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Minutes: 2 August 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Tuesday, 3 August)
• [2nd draft] Agenda: 2-4 August 2004 WS Description WG FTF (Sunday, 1 August)

Mark Baker

• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Proposed resolution for issue 198 (Monday, 2 August)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Tuesday, 10 August)
• RE: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Tuesday, 3 August)
• RE: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Tuesday, 3 August)

NewSunGraphics

• Subscription to the NewSunGraphics newsletter (Friday, 27 August)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: Slides (Tuesday, 3 August)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: SOAP 11 Binding: Design Questions (Monday, 9 August)

Savas Parastatidis

• International Journal of Web Services Research Call For Papers: Special Edition on Web Services Architecture (Thursday, 26 August)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Re: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Re: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18 (Tuesday, 3 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution for issue 199 (Monday, 2 August)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 August 2004 21:36:17 UTC