W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Minority objection to requiring unique GEDs or required feature to distinguish operations

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:38:05 -0400
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Cc: paul.downey@bt.com, jacek.kopecky@deri.org, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <20040812113805.13089c85.alewis@tibco.com>

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:45:28 -0400
Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com> wrote:
> ...the key word here being "declaring".  By saying that you HAVE to
> somehow declare how this works, you gain clarity (from Latin "de+clare,
> to make clear").  Sure, someone could define an extension which means

Thanks, Glen!

Now, would you mind adding the Latinate eymologies for:





Could you also explain how prescription has managed to get into a
description language?

Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2004 15:38:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:50 UTC