W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Editorial for Part 1 section 2.18

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:42:24 +0100
Message-Id: <CE954170-E539-11D8-AB2A-000D93C1F7A6@isr.umd.edu>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> <www-ws-desc@w3.org> <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

On Aug 3, 2004, at 11:00 AM, Martin Gudgin wrote:

> I believe the property used to be called {namespace name} and was
> populated with the value of wsdl:definitions/@targetNamespace.
> Personally, I think {namespace name} is the better name, as the 
> property
> is NOT a *target* namespace when it appears on an interface component (
> or any other component for that matter ). To my mine, the notion of
> target namespace is purely a serialization detail.

FWIW, I have no stake in the naming, just the consistency. As it 
stands, there is not reference I was able to find to a {namespace name} 
anywhere except this section. That leaves QName resolution undefined, 
AFAICT.

But while I'm here, I would find a table/index of components and 
component properties very handy (perhaps in the Primer).

(E.g., something like:	
	http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#appA)

Whoa, they liked it so much that the did it twice:	
	http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/#TermIndex

If people thought it was worth having, I'd volunteer to compile such an 
index.)

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 06:42:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:32 GMT