- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 04:08:03 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, public-ws-media-types@w3.org, Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > The Internet media type system doesn't have a general concept of > validity, so I'm uncomfortable linking XML Schema validity to > format-specific constraints in this manner; implementations may > interpret them in different ways, causing interoperability problems. > > A safer approach would be to stay silent on the relationship between > schema validity and media types, and forcing any errors to the > application level. Mark: WSDL 2.0 is silent on what to do when the message does not match the description. The WSD WG decided that the media types spec should also stay silent on what happens if the the pattern in the annotation and the value of the attribute does not match. I hope that this meets your expectations. -Anish -- > > Cheers, > > > On Aug 1, 2004, at 5:37 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote: > >> >> Issue 198 [1] states: >> "Mismatch between value of media type attribute and pattern -- says >> nothing about the data." >> >> I understand this issue to mean that the 'Assigning Media Types to >> Binary Data in XML' document does not say anything about what happens >> if the value of the 'contentType' attribute does not match the schema >> annotation. >> >> I would like to suggest that we resolve this issue by saying that >> this case is no different than the case of a message not conforming >> with the schema specified in WSDL for that message. >> >> -Anish >> -- >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd- >> issues.html#x198 >> [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/media-types/xml- >> media-types.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 >> >> >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist > Office of the CTO BEA Systems >
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2004 07:08:58 UTC