- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:56:44 +0600
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I'm confused - which SOAP 1.1 WSDL binding defines a the indicated MEP URI? Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com> Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 10:15 PM Subject: Re: SOAP 11 Binding: Design Questions > > If most SOAP stacks are now WS-I compliant (which I assume they are), > then I think we should support this second MEP. > > JJ. > > Asir Vedamuthu wrote: > > >Q5. WS-I Basic Profile 1.0 defines a new message exchange pattern: one-way > >(R2714, R2750, R2727) [4]. SOAP 11 binding provides a URI for this MEP, > > > >* http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/soap11/mep/one-way > >* .. > > > >Shall we allow it? > > > > >
Received on Monday, 9 August 2004 16:57:20 UTC