public-w3process@w3.org from December 2013 by author

Arthur Barstow

• Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Objection to publishing DOM Parsing and Serialization (was Re: CfC: publish LCWD of DOM Parsing and Serialization; deadline December 3) (Saturday, 7 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Saturday, 7 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-72 (change types): Rationalising the definition of different types of change [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references [Publication Rules (aka PubRules)] (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-72 (change types): Rationalising the definition of different types of change [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Re : AB Ivory Tower [Was: Re: [tr] Proposed New Outline] (Wednesday, 4 December)
• AB Ivory Tower [Was: Re: [tr] Proposed New Outline] (Tuesday, 3 December)

Charles McCathie Nevile

• Apologies for today (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Comments on 6 December 2013 Chapter 7 draft (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments on 6 December 2013 Chapter 7 draft (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-74 (NeXtSteps?): Must specs describe next steps? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Comments on 6 December 2013 Chapter 7 draft (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: New chapter 7 draft (Thursday, 12 December)
• New chapter 7 draft (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: [tr] Proposed New Outline (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Friday, 6 December)
• New draft of process proposal (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: getting external review of W3C process changes (Thursday, 5 December)
• closing issues... (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Purpose (and Naming) of LCCR (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-65 (Ch7-Define-(un)Stable): Chapter 7: define stable and unstable [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-60 (Ch7-Evolution): Chapter 7 should be moved to Github to encourage and facilitate contributions to its evolution [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-69 (Ch7-Get-Review-from-SDOs): Chapter 7: get Wide Review of Chapter 7 from other SDOs [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: Issue-55 [Was: Re: [minutes] 2013-11-25 Chapter 7 Revisions meeting] (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: Purpose (and Naming) of LCCR (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: LCCR period too short (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: [tr] Proposed New Outline (Sunday, 1 December)

Coralie Mercier

• [minutes] 2013-12-02 Revising W3C Process Community Group Teleconference (Thursday, 5 December)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: AB Ivory Tower [Was: Re: [tr] Proposed New Outline] (Tuesday, 3 December)

fantasai

• Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 2 December (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: New proposal for transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-20] (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Purpose (and Naming) of LCCR (Monday, 2 December)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Comments on 6 December 2013 Chapter 7 draft (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Comments on 6 December 2013 Chapter 7 draft (Friday, 13 December)
• Comments on 6 December 2013 Chapter 7 draft (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-73 (PubRules-Evolution): Pub Rules' rules, maintenance, evolution, etc. should be transparent and Public [Publication Rules (aka PubRules)] (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-72 (change types): Rationalising the definition of different types of change [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 6 December)

JC

• Re : AB Ivory Tower [Was: Re: [tr] Proposed New Outline] (Tuesday, 3 December)

JC Verdié

• Re: AB Ivory Tower [Was: Re: [tr] Proposed New Outline] (Wednesday, 4 December)

Jeff Jaffe

• Re: Purpose (and Naming) of LCCR (Monday, 2 December)

Larry Masinter

• getting external review of W3C process changes (Thursday, 5 December)

Ralph Swick

• Re: New proposal for transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-20] (Monday, 2 December)
• New proposal for transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-20] (Monday, 2 December)

Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

• w3process-ISSUE-80: Publishing Note to end unfinished REC should only be SHOULD (Friday, 13 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication (Friday, 13 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-78 (Redundant Rescindment Requirements): Requirements for public discussion and wide review of rescindment request are redundant [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Thursday, 12 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-77 (Publishing a Rec): Clarify the process of moving from CR to REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Thursday, 12 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-76 (CR changelogs): Requirement to document changes between CR publications [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Thursday, 12 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-75 (Announcing transitions): How and to whom are transitions announced? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Thursday, 12 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-74 (NeXtSteps?): Must specs describe next steps? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Thursday, 12 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-73 (PubRules-Evolution): Pub Rules' rules, maintenance, evolution, etc. should be transparent and Public [Publication Rules (aka PubRules)] (Friday, 6 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-72 (change types): Rationalising the definition of different types of change [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Friday, 6 December)
• w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references [Publication Rules (aka PubRules)] (Thursday, 5 December)

Stephen Zilles

• RE: New chapter 7 draft (Monday, 16 December)

Steve Zilles

• Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 16 December (Monday, 16 December)
• Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 2 December (Monday, 2 December)

Last message date: Monday, 16 December 2013 18:16:58 UTC