W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2013

Re: w3process-ISSUE-69 (Ch7-Get-Review-from-SDOs): Chapter 7: get Wide Review of Chapter 7 from other SDOs [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 14:17:39 +1000
To: public-w3process@w3.org, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.w7ejvpxhy3oazb@chaals.local>
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 03:38:48 +1000, Revising W3C Process Community Group  
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> w3process-ISSUE-69 (Ch7-Get-Review-from-SDOs): Chapter 7: get Wide  
> Review of Chapter 7 from other SDOs [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/69
>
> Raised by: Arthur Barstow
> On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)
>
> This was raised in:
>
> [[
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Nov/0062.html>.
>
> Since a number of SDOs (IETF, etc.) reference W3C standards, what is the
> plan to get those SDOs to review the Draft of Chapter 7?

There isn't one, beyond getting some informal clarification that it  
doesn't jeapordise our status as an ISO PAS submitter (which would happen  
if e.g. we suddenly moved everything to the CG process).

> One potential issue for organizations that reference W3C standards based
> on Process-20151014 is if they explicitly cite/reference any of the
> maturity levels that are proposed to be deleted (i.e. LC and PR).

Yeah. Where in the real world is that a problem?

cheers

> ]]
>
> Before the proposal is ratified by the Director, SDOs that reference W3C  
> spec should be asked to review the proposal as well as a heads-up that:
>
> 1. LC is deleted
>
> 2. PR is deleted
>
> 3. Groups have a requirement to seek review but each group can define  
> their own process to do the review.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Sunday, 1 December 2013 07:18:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC