W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2013

Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:35:00 -0500
Message-ID: <52A1D284.6040905@nokia.com>
To: ext Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
CC: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 12/6/13 8:34 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> Come to think about it, I have a strong preference to use 
>> <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/> for all 
>> process-related bug and issue tracking including publication rules. 
>> Please do NOT bury this Issue in particular in Member-confidential 
>> space. 
> A new space would be public. But this is still not the right forum.

Why?
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 13:39:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC