- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:13:37 -0500
- To: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Ian - I see that you closed this Issue without any discussion. I don't think that is appropriate since neither the list or I were automatically notified that you closed this bug. I reopened it. If you think some other Issues list is a better place to raise Publication Rules issues, then please let me know the location of that service. -Thanks, AB On 12/5/13 8:42 AM, ext Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker wrote: > w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references [Publication Rules (aka PubRules)] > > http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/71 > > Raised by: Arthur Barstow > On product: Publication Rules (aka PubRules) > > Yesterday, the Team blocked a Publication Request because WHATWG references in the document requested to be published weren't acceptable. Instead of having du jour pub rules for references to WHATWG specs, please: > > 1. Create a Public document that prescribes what is acceptable for WHATWG references > > 2. Update <http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules> to check the rules in #1 > > > >
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 13:21:47 UTC