W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2013

Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references [Publication Rules (aka PubRules)]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:13:37 -0500
Message-ID: <52A1CD81.7090607@nokia.com>
To: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Ian - I see that you closed this Issue without any discussion. I don't 
think that is appropriate since neither the list or I were automatically 
notified that you closed this bug.

I reopened it.

If you think some other Issues list is a better place to raise 
Publication Rules issues, then please let me know the location of that 
service.

-Thanks, AB

On 12/5/13 8:42 AM, ext Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue 
Tracker wrote:
> w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references [Publication Rules (aka PubRules)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/71
>
> Raised by: Arthur Barstow
> On product: Publication Rules (aka PubRules)
>
> Yesterday, the Team blocked a Publication Request because WHATWG references in the document requested to be published weren't acceptable. Instead of having du jour pub rules for references to WHATWG specs, please:
>
> 1. Create a Public document that prescribes what is acceptable for WHATWG references
>
> 2. Update <http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules> to check the rules in #1
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 13:21:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC