W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2013

Re: w3process-ISSUE-71 (PubRules-WHATWG): Define PubRules for WHATWG references

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 08:43:53 -0500
Message-ID: <52A1D499.7040501@nokia.com>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
CC: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 12/6/13 8:41 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/6/13 8:34 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
>>> On Dec 6, 2013, at 7:24 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Come to think about it, I have a strong preference to use <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/> for all process-related bug and issue tracking including publication rules. Please do NOT bury this Issue in particular in Member-confidential space.
>>> A new space would be public. But this is still not the right forum.
> Responsibility for pubrules lies with the comm team, not this group.

Well that's certainly a bug.

AB Priority+ take on Pub Rules and make sure related discussions are 
done in a Public forum.
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 13:49:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC