W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2013

Re: w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:09:18 -0600
Cc: public-w3process@w3.org, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FC0CD4D9-416F-407A-A148-53BEA396B1F0@w3.org>
To: "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>

On Dec 13, 2013, at 9:58 AM, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:59:00 +0400, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/79
>> 

[snip]

>> But if the group has some reason for NOT publishing, it makes no sense to require them to publish. Clearly just adding 2 sentences of status update will be useful and sufficient.
> 
> Sure. If there is a way to do that (adding a new date), it is Publishing, no?

Yes; people just send a request to the Webmaster to update the status.

Ian

> 
> cheers
> 
> chaals
> 
> -- 
> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>      chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 16:09:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC