W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2013

Re: w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no publication

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:52:43 +0400
To: "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: public-w3process@w3.org, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.w76lt5s3y3oazb@dhcp-219-197-wifi.yandex.net>
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:09:18 +0400, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 9:58 AM, "Charles McCathie Nevile"  
> <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 08:59:00 +0400, Revising W3C Process Community  
>> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> w3process-ISSUE-79: Don't require republication after 6 months of no  
>>> publication
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/79
>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>> But if the group has some reason for NOT publishing, it makes no sense  
>>> to require them to publish. Clearly just adding 2 sentences of status  
>>> update will be useful and sufficient.
>>
>> Sure. If there is a way to do that (adding a new date), it is  
>> Publishing, no?
>
> Yes; people just send a request to the Webmaster to update the status.

Excellent!

By the way, there is no proposal to change this requirement from SHOULD to  
MUST. Also having it be so easy is good news.

So I don't think there is any remaining disagreement.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 10:53:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:09 UTC