www-voice@w3.org from January to March 2013 by date

Sunday, 31 March 2013

RE: DOM in _event.data and KVPs Jim Barnett

Saturday, 30 March 2013

DOM in _event.data and KVPs Stefan Radomski

Friday, 29 March 2013

Re: Test152: Foreach with string literal as item? Stefan Radomski
Test152: Foreach with string literal as item? Stefan Radomski
RE: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition Jim Barnett
Re: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition Stefan Radomski
Re: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition David Junger
Re: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition David Junger
RE: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition Jim Barnett
Re: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition Stefan Radomski
Re: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition Stefan Radomski

Thursday, 28 March 2013

RE: SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition Jim Barnett
SCXML test 147: transition contains empty condition Stefan Radomski
RE: wrong tag and missing attribute in the SCXML document example Jim Barnett
wrong tag and missing attribute in the SCXML document example spam.spam.spam.spam@free.fr
RE: some tests for SCXML Jim Barnett

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

Re: some tests for SCXML Stefan Radomski

Monday, 18 March 2013

some tests for SCXML Jim Barnett

Friday, 8 March 2013

Re: more on preemption chris nuernberger
RE: more on preemption Jim Barnett
Re: revised mainEventLoop chris nuernberger
Re: revised mainEventLoop David Junger
Re: more on preemption chris nuernberger
RE: more on preemption Jim Barnett
Re: more on preemption chris nuernberger
Re: revised mainEventLoop chris nuernberger
Re: revised mainEventLoop chris nuernberger
Re: revised mainEventLoop David Junger
Re: revised mainEventLoop David Junger
Re: revised mainEventLoop chris nuernberger
Re: more on preemption Stefan Radomski
RE: more on preemption Jim Barnett
Re: more on preemption Gavin Kistner
more on preemption Jim Barnett
RE: revised mainEventLoop Jim Barnett
Re: revised mainEventLoop David Junger

Friday, 1 March 2013

Re: preemption again (sigh...) chris nuernberger

Thursday, 28 February 2013

RE: preemption again (sigh...) Jim Barnett
Re: preemption again (sigh...) chris nuernberger
RE: preemption again (sigh...) Michael Bodell
preemption again (sigh...) Jim Barnett

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

RE: proposed new definition of preemption Jim Barnett
RE: proposed new definition of preemption Michael Bodell
Re: proposed new definition of preemption chris nuernberger
RE: proposed new definition of preemption Jim Barnett
Re: proposed new definition of preemption David Junger
RE: proposed new definition of preemption Jim Barnett
Re: proposed new definition of preemption David Junger
Re: proposed new definition of preemption chris nuernberger
RE: proposed new definition of preemption Jim Barnett
Re: proposed new definition of preemption David Junger

Monday, 25 February 2013

proposed new definition of preemption Jim Barnett

Thursday, 21 February 2013

revised mainEventLoop Jim Barnett

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

RE: On <scxml> not being a <state> Jim Barnett
Re: On <scxml> not being a <state> David Junger
Re: On <scxml> not being a <state> Gavin Kistner
RE: On <scxml> not being a <state> Michael Bodell

Tuesday, 19 February 2013

RE: On <scxml> not being a <state> Jim Barnett
Re: On <scxml> not being a <state> Gavin Kistner
RE: On <scxml> not being a <state> Jim Barnett
On <scxml> not being a <state> Gavin Kistner

Monday, 18 February 2013

RE: revisiting preemption Jim Barnett
RE: revisiting preemption Jim Barnett
Re: revisiting preemption chris nuernberger
Re: revisiting preemption David Junger
Re: revisiting preemption chris nuernberger
revisiting preemption Jim Barnett

Friday, 15 February 2013

Re: External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski
Re: Run global <script> before or after <datamodel> initialization? Gavin Kistner
RE: Run global <script> before or after <datamodel> initialization? Jim Barnett

Thursday, 14 February 2013

Re: Run global <script> before or after <datamodel> initialization? Gavin Kistner
RE: Run global <script> before or after <datamodel> initialization? Jim Barnett
Cloud-Based Voice Commands Sean Powers
RE: Run global <script> before or after <datamodel> initialization? Jim Barnett
Run global <script> before or after <datamodel> initialization? Gavin Kistner
Re: revised enterStates chris nuernberger
RE: revised enterStates Jim Barnett
RE: use your SCXML examples in my work Jim Barnett
RE: revised enterStates Jim Barnett
Re: External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski
Re: External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski
use your SCXML examples in my work spam.spam.spam.spam@free.fr
Re: External communication with SCXML David Junger
Re: External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

Re: revised enterStates Stefan Radomski
Re: It would be a lot cooler if: chris nuernberger
revised enterStates Jim Barnett
RE: It would be a lot cooler if: Jim Barnett
It would be a lot cooler if: chris nuernberger
RE: again a bad initial target in the SCXML document example Jim Barnett
RE: Adding history states with recorded history Jim Barnett
RE: data id verse assign location Jim Barnett
data id verse assign location chris nuernberger
Re: again a bad initial target in the SCXML document example David Junger
Re: bad initial target in the SCXML document example David Junger
again a bad initial target in the SCXML document example spam.spam.spam.spam@free.fr
bad initial target in the SCXML document example spam.spam.spam.spam@free.fr
bad state name in the SCXML document example spam.spam.spam.spam@free.fr
Adding history states with recorded history Gavin Kistner

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Re: Fallback for LCCA when <scxml> is included Gavin Kistner
RE: Fallback for LCCA when <scxml> is included Jim Barnett
Fallback for LCCA when <scxml> is included Gavin Kistner
Re: External communication with SCXML David Junger
RE: Memory element Jim Barnett
Re: External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski
Memory element chris nuernberger
ISSUE-831: Should default <send> target be specific to the I/O Processor? [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski
Re: Default target of <send> David Junger
undeclared namespace in the SCXML document example spam.spam.spam.spam@free.fr
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jacob Beard
RE: Default target of <send> Jim Barnett
:: Academic MindTrek Conference 2013 :: DEADLINE FOR WORKSHOPS & TUTORIALS 28th APRIL 2013 :: Cf Papers, Posters, Tutorials, Extended Abstracts, Demos, and Workshops artur.lugmayr@tut.fi

Monday, 11 February 2013

Re: External communication with SCXML Pierre.Wellner@inficon.com
Default target of <send> David Junger
Re: External communication with SCXML David Junger
Re: External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski
RE: Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine Michael Bodell
Re: Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine chris nuernberger
RE: Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine Michael Bodell
Re: Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine chris nuernberger
RE: Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine Michael Bodell
Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine chris nuernberger
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Stefan Radomski
Re: External communication with SCXML David Junger
External communication with SCXML Stefan Radomski
dupplicated word in the SCXML document spam.spam.spam.spam@free.fr

Sunday, 10 February 2013

RE: Transition order Jim Barnett
RE: Reentering child of parallel state leaves all childs? Jim Barnett
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jacob Beard
Link to scxml-strict.xsd points to scxml.xsd Jacob Beard
Re: Reentering child of parallel state leaves all childs? Stefan Radomski
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jacob Beard
Re: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code Stefan Radomski
Transition order David Junger

Saturday, 9 February 2013

Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Stefan Radomski
Re: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code chris nuernberger
RE: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code Jim Barnett
Re: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code chris nuernberger
RE: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code Jim Barnett
RE: Reentering child of parallel state leaves all childs? Jim Barnett
Reentering child of parallel state leaves all childs? Stefan Radomski
Re: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code chris nuernberger
Re: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code chris nuernberger
Re: Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code chris nuernberger
Bug with deep and shallow history in pseudo-code Stefan Radomski

Friday, 8 February 2013

Re: ISSUE-830: Bug in transition with target of history state [SCXML-LC-Comments] Stefan Radomski
RE: ISSUE-830: Bug in transition with target of history state [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
RE: ISSUE-830: Bug in transition with target of history state [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
ISSUE-830: Bug in transition with target of history state [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption Jim Barnett
Re: Illegal configuration with history in pseudocode chris nuernberger
Illegal configuration with history in pseudocode Stefan Radomski
Re: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption chris nuernberger
RE: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption Jim Barnett
RE: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption Jim Barnett
Re: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption chris nuernberger
Re: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption chris nuernberger
RE: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption Jim Barnett
Re: ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption chris nuernberger
ISSUE-826 Re: More Problems with Preemption Jim Barnett
ISSUE-826 RE: More Problems with Preemption Jim Barnett
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jacob Beard
Re: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Stefan Radomski
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Stefan Radomski

Thursday, 7 February 2013

Re: More Problems with Preemption chris nuernberger
Re: More Problems with Preemption David Junger
RE: Guarding against infinite loops and other poorly-designed machines Michael Bodell

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Guarding against infinite loops and other poorly-designed machines Gavin Kistner
More Problems with Preemption Gavin Kistner

Friday, 1 February 2013

Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jacob Beard
RE: ISSUE-829: exiting parallel due to external transition [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
ISSUE-829: exiting parallel due to external transition [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: ISSUE-828: Unique IDs for Transitions [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
ISSUE-828: Unique IDs for Transitions [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Unique ids for transitions David Junger

Thursday, 31 January 2013

Unique ids for transitions Gavin Kistner
Exiting an entire <parallel> due to an external transition Gavin Kistner

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Re: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Zhou, Guojun

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Re: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Johan Roxendal

Tuesday, 29 January 2013

RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
Re: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Gavin Kistner
RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
Re: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Johan Roxendal
RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
Re: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Johan Roxendal
RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
RE: ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
Re: My experience and issues implementing an SCXML Interpreter Jim Barnett
ISSUE-827: bug in detecting final states [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: Determining When a Machine is Final Jim Barnett
Re: Determining When a Machine is Final Gavin Kistner
Determining When a Machine is Final Gavin Kistner

Monday, 28 January 2013

RE: Does <send> place events on the internal or external queue? Jim Barnett
Does <send> place events on the internal or external queue? Gavin Kistner
RE: <send> expressions in example G.1 Jim Barnett
<send> expressions in example G.1 Gavin Kistner
Re: My experience and issues implementing an SCXML Interpreter Jim Barnett

Sunday, 27 January 2013

RE: ISSUE-826: comments from Gavin Kistner [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett

Saturday, 26 January 2013

Re: ISSUE-826: comments from Gavin Kistner [SCXML-LC-Comments] Gavin Kistner
[SCXML] detailing transition preemption Johan Roxendal

Friday, 25 January 2013

RE: ISSUE-826: comments from Gavin Kistner [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
ISSUE-826: comments from Gavin Kistner [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 24 January 2013

My experience and issues implementing an SCXML Interpreter Gavin Kistner

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Re: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jacob Beard
RE: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
RE: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
Re: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Stefan Radomski
Re: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] David Junger
Re: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jacob Beard
RE: ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Jim Barnett
ISSUE-825: comments from Darmstadt [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Stefan Radomski

Monday, 21 January 2013

Re: subscribe does not work Cindy-Sue Causey
subscribe does not work Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka

Thursday, 17 January 2013

Re: ISSUE-822 David Junger
RE: ISSUE-822 Jim Barnett
Re: ISSUE-822 David Junger

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

ISSUE-822 Jim Barnett
ISSUE-822: Issues with Event I/O Processors [SCXML-LC-Comments] Voice Browser Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Problem with validation schema Jim Barnett

Thursday, 10 January 2013

Problem with validation schema legven@gmail.com

Wednesday, 9 January 2013

Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users David Junger
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jacob Beard
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users David Junger
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jacob Beard
Re: Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users David Junger

Monday, 7 January 2013

Soliciting Comments from SCXML Users Jim Barnett

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2013 23:20:35 UTC