- From: Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:28:47 -0700
- To: "www-voice@w3.org" <www-voice@w3.org>
On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:17 PM, Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com> wrote: > Consider this test case: > > <scxml xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml" version="1.0" name="HistoryTest"> > <state id="s" initial="s1"> > <state id="s1"> > <onentry><raise event="go"/></onentry> > <transition event="go" target="pass"/> > </state> > <final id="pass"/> > </state> > </scxml> > > 1) Is my test case wrong? Should entering the 'pass' final above not kill the interpreter? Please forgive the noise and ignore this thread. Further reading on the semantics of <final> (which I should have done before sending the message) shows that my test code is wrong. As noted in section 3.7.2, a compound state entering a <final> state is itself final, but the state machine is only stopped when (as the algorithm code tests) a direct <final> child of <scxml> is entered.
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 05:29:23 UTC