Re: Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine

Did you integrate with a scripting language for your SCXML model or did you
use code generation or something like that to keep everything in c++?

Chris


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Michael Bodell <bodell@247-inc.com> wrote:

>  FWIW we implement some of our SIP stack using SCXML state machines to
> capture the SIP flow (the SCXML implementation is a C++ one where the
> external events are actually C++ “event” objects that get delivered to
> other threads).  Because some of the SIP signaling specifications are
> complex with lots of contingencies the SCXML is easier to develop and test
> than the “native” code driven state machines we’d used before.  So I think
> there is benefit there for handling lots of different protocols (assuming
> your SCXML interpreter is robust).****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* chris nuernberger [mailto:cnuernber@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2013 10:49 AM
> *To:* VBWG Public (www-voice@w3.org)
> *Subject:* Implement TCP with scxml compliant state machine****
>
> ** **
>
> It would be extremely interesting to implement the TCP stack with an SCXML
> state machine.****
>
> ** **
>
> You could then compare its characteristics (performance, security,
> correctness, flexibility) with a native C implementation and see where the
> benefits lie.****
>
> ** **
>
> I wonder if any OS grad students would be interested in that for a summer
> of code project.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> Chris
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds - Emerson ****
>



-- 
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds - Emerson