Monday, 31 March 2003
- Extended deadline: AAMAS Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems
- Re: Ontology Mapping
- Owl question
- RE: OWL Tutorial
- ANN: OWL Tutorial
- Re: OWL Lite's restrictions on the use of the OWL vocabulary
- Re: OWL Lite's restrictions on the use of the OWL vocabulary
- Re: <owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="FOO"> --> Object or DatatypeProperty?
- Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf
- Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf
- Who's building models for business
- Re: OWL Lite's restrictions on the use of the OWL vocabulary
Sunday, 30 March 2003
- OWL Lite's restrictions on the use of the OWL vocabulary
- The domain value of a owl:subClassOf statement (OWL DL)
- Re: Using MIME types in RDF/DAML and Image Metadata
- Re: <owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="FOO"> --> Object or DatatypeProperty?
- Re: The Robber and the Speeder: an exciting inference
- RE: intersectionOf and subClassOf
- Using MIME types in RDF/DAML and Image Metadata
- Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf
- RE: intersectionOf and subClassOf
- Re: <owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="FOO"> --> Object or Datatype Property?
- Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf
- Re: OWL Lite's restrictions on the use of the OWL vocabulary
- Re: The domain value of a owl:subClassOf statement (OWL DL)
- Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf
- intersectionOf and subClassOf
- <owl:FunctionalProperty rdf:ID="FOO"> --> Object or Datatype Property?
Saturday, 29 March 2003
- Re: About self-referential syntactic constructs
- What can we draw enlightenment from the Fixpoint Semantics in designing Web Ontology Language?
- About self-referential syntactic constructs
Friday, 28 March 2003
- CFP: Workshop on Semantic Integration at ISWC'2003
- Re: Multiple Functional Properties equivalent to Intersection?
- Re: Multiple Functional Properties equivalent to Intersection?
Thursday, 27 March 2003
- Re: The Robber and the Speeder: an exciting inference
- Re: Multiple Functional Properties equivalent to Intersection?
- Re: The Robber and the Speeder: an exciting inference
- Re: Multiple Functional Properties equivalent to Intersection?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Re: Multiple Functional Properties equivalent to Intersection?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Multiple Functional Properties equivalent to Intersection?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
Wednesday, 26 March 2003
- Ontology Mapping
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Re: Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
- Difference between cardinality=1 and FunctionalProperty?
Tuesday, 25 March 2003
- Re: Declarative limitations of OWL/DAML
- Re: Declarative limitations of OWL/DAML
- Re: Declarative limitations of OWL/DAML
- Re: Declarative limitations of OWL/DAML
- Re: Declarative limitations of OWL/DAML
- Declarative limitations of OWL/DAML
Monday, 24 March 2003
Friday, 21 March 2003
- Re: The Robber and the Speeder: an exciting inference
- Re: OWL Question
- OWL Question
- daml:imports question
Tuesday, 18 March 2003
Monday, 17 March 2003
- Re: An exciting inference?
- Re: An exciting inference?
- Re: An exciting inference?
- URI/RDF math
- Re: An exciting inference?
- Re: An exciting inference?
- Re: The Robber and the Speeder: an exciting inference
- The Robber and the Speeder: an exciting inference
- toIcal.py does timezones etc. now
Sunday, 16 March 2003
Saturday, 15 March 2003
- Re: An exciting inference?
- Re: An exciting inference?
- Re: An exciting inference?
- An exciting inference?
Friday, 14 March 2003
- Re: Benefits of using DL or Lite over using Full?
- Re: Benefits of using DL or Lite over using Full?
- Summer School: Ontological Engineering and Semantic Web (SSSW-2003)
- Re: Benefits of using DL or Lite over using Full?
- Re: Benefits of using DL or Lite over using Full?
- Re: Benefits of using DL or Lite over using Full?
- Re: Benefits of using DL or Lite over using Full?
- Benefits of using DL or Lite over using Full?
- Re: Any free, Java-based OWL tools?
Thursday, 13 March 2003
- RE: Any free, Java-based OWL tools?
- Any free, Java-based OWL tools?
- Re: problem of DAML+OIL
- RE: SUMMARY: Treating a class as both an instance and as a class, i.e., a metaclass
- Re: SUMMARY: Treating a class as both an instance and as a class, i.e., a metaclass
Wednesday, 12 March 2003
Tuesday, 11 March 2003
- Re: Definition of "metaclass"?
- Definition of "metaclass"?
- Re: Using OWL to define itself?
- Re: Using OWL to define itself?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
Monday, 10 March 2003
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- CFP: AAMAS Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- Is this a good example of a class that is also an individual?
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- RE: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- RE: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Need example of a River class being used as an individual ... anyone?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: No rdfs:range specified for owl:hasValue ... an error?
- Re: Using OWL to define itself?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: Circular definition of Thing?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Using OWL to define itself?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: No rdfs:range specified for owl:hasValue ... an error?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: No rdfs:range specified for owl:hasValue ... an error?
Sunday, 9 March 2003
- No rdfs:range specified for owl:hasValue ... an error?
- Looking for example of semantic web and RDF in learning material metadata
- Re: NEED RESOLUTION: "Define" a class, or "Declare" a class? "Define" a property, or "Declare" a property?
- Re: Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- NEED RESOLUTION: "Define" a class, or "Declare" a class? "Define" a property, or "Declare" a property?
- Treating a class as both an individual and a class?
- Re: DTD for OWL document?
- Circular definition of Thing?
Thursday, 6 March 2003
- Deadline extended: IJCAI'03 Workshop on Ontologies and Distributed Systems
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- DTD for OWL document?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- ISWC2003 Second Announcement
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
Wednesday, 5 March 2003
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: "Define" a class, or "Declare" a class? "Define" a property, or "Declare" a property?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Typo in previous message [was Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?]
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: "Define" a class, or "Declare" a class? "Define" a property, or "Declare" a property?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: RECAP: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- RE: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: RECAP: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- Re: RECAP: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- RE: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- RE: Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- "Define" a class, or "Declare" a class? "Define" a property, or "Declare" a property?
- Even more Fuzzy about FunctionalProperty!
- RECAP: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- RE: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- RE: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
Tuesday, 4 March 2003
- RE: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- RE: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- RE: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty?
- ISWC2003 Call for Industry Papers
- Special Issue of the International Journal of Electronic Commerce (IJEC)
- DL'03 first CfP - Description Logics Workshop 2003