- From: Nikita Ogievetsky <nogievet@cogx.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:24:08 -0800
- To: <costello@mitre.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > No, this is not good modelling. If you want to say that Davenport has a > River, you should say so, via > > <City rdf:ID="Davenport"> > <rdfs:subClassOf> > <owl:Restriction> > <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="hasFeature" /> > <owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="http://geodesy.org#River"/> > </owl:Restriction> > </rdfs:subClassOf> > .... > </City> > Hmmm.... Peter, in your example an individual city is a class? Should not it be something like: <CityOnARiver rdf:ID="Davenport"> .... </CityOnARiver> <owl:Class rdf:ID="CityOnARiver"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#River"> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="hasFeature" /> <owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="http://geodesy.org#River"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> </owl:Class> --Nikita Nikita Ogievetsky, nogievet@cogx.com; Cogitech Inc. http://www.cogx.com Topic Maps Tutorials and Consulting. phone: 1 (917) 406 - 8734 Nikita Ogievetsky, nogievet@cogx.com; Cogitech Inc. http://www.cogx.com Topic Maps Tutorials and Consulting. phone: 1 (917) 406 - 8734
Received on Monday, 10 March 2003 10:24:22 UTC