- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:03:18 -0500 (EST)
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Subject: Re: Why isn't FunctionalProperty a subClassOf owl:ObjectProperty? Date: 05 Mar 2003 09:50:50 -0500 [...] > > In OWL Full, there is no need for the division of properties into > > individual-valued and data-valued. In OWL Full, stating that property is an > > owl:ObjectProperty doesn't place any restrictions on the property, > > Really? I guess I need to study this layering stuff more closely. This is somewhat of a new feature, driven by one of the recent changes to the RDF model theory (namely making LV part of IR). > Is your presentation tomorrow likely to elucidate details like this? > > "3:30 - 15:30 First afternoon session > Semantic Layering. presentation by Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Pat > Hayes" > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/#L1130 No. Tomorrow is for philosophy. :-) > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ peter
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:03:35 UTC