www-patentpolicy-comment@w3.org from January 2003 by thread

Urge approval of draft policy Alex Jacques (Wednesday, 29 January)

Rutgers and VoiceXML - please do your best _not_ to give Rutgers Ed Allen Smith (Wednesday, 29 January)

Acacia Research software patent claim for streaming media robert mudry (Saturday, 25 January)

Summary of 13 January 2003 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference Susan Lesch (Saturday, 25 January)

Some more background info on MS' views Peter Berenyi (Wednesday, 22 January)

Standardization process à la Microsoft Peter Berenyi (Wednesday, 22 January)

SBC Pursuing "RAND" Patent on Website Navigation Seth Johnson (Monday, 20 January)

SPI response to Microsoft comment of January 16. Bruce Perens (Sunday, 19 January)

Comments on Microsoft's views Gervase Markham (Saturday, 18 January)

A response to Microsoft's carefully worded letter Eric M. Hopper (Saturday, 18 January)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Michael Spahn (Friday, 17 January)

MS views on Last Call Patent Policy Draft David Turner (Thursday, 16 January)

Approve of draft disapprove of software patenting. John Pisini (Tuesday, 14 January)

Summary of 6 January 2003 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference Susan Lesch (Tuesday, 14 January)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Hubbard, Marc (Monday, 13 January)

No software patents! Pontus Johannisson (Monday, 13 January)

Comments on the W3C patent policy Adrián De León (Sunday, 12 January)

Disagree with the "field of use" restriction Alex Borges (lex) (Sunday, 12 January)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Mark Janssen (Thursday, 9 January)

Patent policy call for comments. vsedach@ucalgary.ca (Tuesday, 31 December)

adopt royalty-free draft policy Andre Lehovich (Tuesday, 31 December)

no limits Geert Stappers (Tuesday, 31 December)

Proposed Patient Policy (Section 3 ) / GPL (Section 7) Paul Lewis (Tuesday, 31 December)

proposed web standards Gene Heskett (Monday, 30 December)

"field of use" Daliel Leite (Tuesday, 31 December)

Patent Policy working draft: RF licensing requirements Ralph Clark (Wednesday, 1 January)

Please ensure patent policy is GPL compliant John Dalton (Tuesday, 31 December)

No 'field of use' patent restrictions Jim Bray (Monday, 30 December)

So-called Patent Policy "bug" of Section 3.3 Dave McFadden (Tuesday, 31 December)

NO on "Royalty-Free Patent Policy" Ron@Dotson.net (Monday, 30 December)

Section 3 of the W3C's proposed patent policy markem (Tuesday, 31 December)

patent policy Edward Welbourne (Tuesday, 31 December)

www patentpolicy comment stephan wehner (Monday, 30 December)

patentholders have failed; please fix section 3, items 3 and 7 James Salsman (Monday, 30 December)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Lourens Steenkamp (Wednesday, 1 January)

final call Joe Gasiorek (Monday, 30 December)

field of use restrictions must go Syd Bauman (Tuesday, 31 December)

W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Denton_Sam@emc.com (Tuesday, 31 December)

W3C's proposed patent policy. Andres L. Figari (Tuesday, 31 December)

royalty-free for web-only use is a dangerous and unwise limitation Jason Lunz (Monday, 30 December)

Feedback Mads Sejersen (Tuesday, 31 December)

No 'field of use' patent restrictions Kevin D. McAllister (Monday, 30 December)

My opinion counts... Lincoln Bertram (Monday, 30 December)

comment on current draft of W3C patent policy Bryan (Monday, 30 December)

Patent Policy - I disapprove of software patents James Nachlin (Tuesday, 31 December)

I believe bill@wadley.org (Monday, 30 December)

Comments: the "field of use" restrictions DFox (Tuesday, 31 December)

Section 3.3 Clark McGrew (Monday, 30 December)

Comment on W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Mike Strean (Tuesday, 31 December)

comment on W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Wallwork, Nathan (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comment Terra Info (Tuesday, 31 December)

W3C Patent Policy Feedback Jason Bechtel (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comments about the proposed patent policy Brett Smith (Wednesday, 1 January)

W3C's proposed patent policy Slim (Tuesday, 31 December)

Section 3 of proposed patent policy proclus@gnu-darwin.org (Tuesday, 31 December)

no loopholes! Jacob Kjome (Tuesday, 31 December)

Please approve draft policy; disapprove of software patents. James Bromberger (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comments on patent policy jlnance@intrex.net (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comments: W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft Cory Trese (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comment on Clause 3 of Section 3 of draft policy Stanley A. Klein (Monday, 30 December)

Royalty-free W3C policies Michael S. Keller (Tuesday, 31 December)

Draft policy, good; software patenting, bad Michael Poole (Tuesday, 31 December)

And about freedom? Charles (Tuesday, 31 December)

Field of use conflict between section 3 item 3 and the GPL Jeff Michel (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comments for the 'field of use' restriction in Section 3, Item 3 of proposed W3C patents policy Jason Lee (Tuesday, 31 December)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Christopher Hicks (Tuesday, 31 December)

Royalty-Free Patent Policy and the GPL Liam Morland (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comments: the "field of use" restrictions in Section 3 Item 3 of the proposed W3C Patents Policy David Kaufman (Tuesday, 31 December)

Draft policy approval Rikard Anglerud (Tuesday, 31 December)

Royalty-Free Patent Policy Francis Smit (Monday, 30 December)

comment B. Chandler (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comment on section 3 item 3. David GLAUDE Mailing (Tuesday, 31 December)

Field of use provision Doug Winter (Tuesday, 31 December)

Proposed patent Policy problem - i.e. Field of Use clause Andy Farnsworth (Tuesday, 31 December)

Open Source Licencing and Patent encumbrance Brian (Tuesday, 31 December)

Worried about possible non-approval of draft policy Nick Phillips (Tuesday, 31 December)

DISAPPROVE of draft policy Sonam Chauhan (Tuesday, 31 December)

Royalty-Free Patent Policy Feedback Steve Murphy (Tuesday, 7 January)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Nickolai Dobrynin (Wednesday, 1 January)

Objection to "field of use" restriction Ben North (Tuesday, 7 January)

Comments on 'W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft' Jesper Juhl (Tuesday, 31 December)

Last Call comment on the patent policy of the W3C Myron (Tuesday, 31 December)

please remove "fields-of-use" restrictions Andrea Borgia (Tuesday, 31 December)

Life paul (Tuesday, 31 December)

Prohibit the imposition of "field of use" restrictions on patent claims contributed to W3C standards Doran Barton (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comment rob@printf.org (Monday, 30 December)

So nearly there... Gervase Markham (Sunday, 29 December)

Draft Patent Policy Paul C. Bryan (Tuesday, 31 December)

Item 3 of Section 3: W3C Royalty-Free (RF) Licensing Requirements Dave Owen (Los Angeles) (Monday, 30 December)

Comment: Free Software Community Arpad Biro (Tuesday, 31 December)

standards must not be subject to patents Justin Chen-Wells (Tuesday, 31 December)

I grudgingly approve of the draft policy Steve Langasek (Wednesday, 1 January)

Last call: Royalty-Free Patent Policy Håkon Wium Lie (Tuesday, 31 December)

Regarding Royalty-Free Patent Policy, sec. 3, item 3 soso@busymonkey.org (Monday, 30 December)

On W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy Lukasz M. Pogoda (Sunday, 29 December)

In favour of draft policy - against software patenting Winston Neutel (Tuesday, 31 December)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting Pierre Machard (Tuesday, 31 December)

Draft Patent Policy Comment John K. Hohm (Tuesday, 31 December)

Royalty-Free Patent Policy: Request for Change in Section 3, Item 3 venugopalm@vmoksha.com (Tuesday, 31 December)

W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft Comment Adam Warner (Monday, 30 December)

FSF position on Section 3 Bruce Badger (Monday, 30 December)

Summary of 16 December 2002 Patent Policy Working Group Teleconference Susan Lesch (Tuesday, 7 January)

Section 3(3) needs to be amended Joachim Achtzehnter (Tuesday, 31 December)

W3 Policy: Up with draft, down with software patents Asheesh Laroia (Monday, 6 January)

Draft policy not ideal but acceptable Brock Frazier (Tuesday, 31 December)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Éric Depagne (Monday, 6 January)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Denis Braekhus (Thursday, 2 January)

Comments on patent policy Arno Peters (Tuesday, 31 December)

Your patent policy problem with free software Ondrej Jombik (Sunday, 5 January)

How free becomes too costly Jerry Asher (Monday, 30 December)

Pass W3C Patent Policy David Teague (Sunday, 5 January)

Royalty-Free Patent Policy GPL Encumbrance = Bad News Zack Johnson (Tuesday, 31 December)

Standards are . . . Seth Johnson (Sunday, 5 January)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Alexander Schmehl (Tuesday, 31 December)

Bug in the proposed draft jonathon (Tuesday, 31 December)

The Future of the W3C (Patent Policy) Colin Bell (Tuesday, 31 December)

Royalty-Free Patent Policy elka@gnosistem.com (Tuesday, 31 December)

I fully support the FSF position on the proposed "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy Lance Heller (Monday, 30 December)

Partially royalty-free patents Andrew Moise (Tuesday, 31 December)

Last call working draft comments Ward Vandewege (Tuesday, 31 December)

Amend Consortium Patent Policy "RF" patent Provision Michael Labhard (Tuesday, 31 December)

Against Item 3 of Section 3 of the proposed Policy on Patents Jay Sulzberger (Friday, 3 January)

[www-patentpolicy-comment] <none> Kendall Helmstetter Gelner (Monday, 30 December)

re:FSF's Position on Proposed W3 Consortium "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy Arvan Reese (Tuesday, 31 December)

Patent Policy Edward Welbourne (Tuesday, 31 December)

Royalty-Free Patent Policy correction Benjamin Johnson (Tuesday, 31 December)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Middleton, Michael (Tuesday, 31 December)

Please drop the "Field of Use" clause. MJ Ray (Tuesday, 31 December)

Support draft policy; Open Source implementations are essential Emile van Bergen (Tuesday, 31 December)

I object to the "Royalty-Free" Patent Policy. Chris Seager (Tuesday, 31 December)

[Resend] So nearly there... Gervase Markham (Friday, 3 January)

Do not accept "field of use" restriction David Allouche (Tuesday, 31 December)

Comments on W3C Patents Policy Mark P Sullivan (Monday, 30 December)

W3C Draft Policy on Royalty-Free Patents D F (Tuesday, 31 December)

Patent policy draft w3ccomment@nickwillson.com (Tuesday, 31 December)

Section 3, Item 3 Freedom Advocate (Friday, 3 January)

Call for Comments: W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Last Call Working Draft Mike S (Tuesday, 31 December)

objection to field of use restrictions Brian Gough (Monday, 30 December)

Approval of draft policy on Software Patenting Alan Chandler (Tuesday, 31 December)

'Field of Use' restriction Peter Abramowicz (Tuesday, 31 December)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting atmcneil@earthlink.net (Tuesday, 31 December)

Royalty Free Patent Policy C. Conrad Cady (Tuesday, 31 December)

Disapprove of software patents, PERIOD. Michael Upchurch (Tuesday, 31 December)

Please keep the standards open and patent free dtwarnick@mmm.com (Tuesday, 31 December)

Disagree with the "field of use" restriction Alex Borges (lex) (Tuesday, 31 December)

archive system bug Daniel Weitzner (Thursday, 2 January)

Comments on W3C Royalty-Free Patent Policy Stephen Scherer (Tuesday, 31 December)

Approve of draft policy - disapprove of software patenting. Kevin Caswick (Tuesday, 31 December)

Another Comment That Failed to Get Posted Seth Johnson (Wednesday, 1 January)

Patent Policy Comments That Failed to Get Posted Seth Johnson (Wednesday, 1 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 January 2003 14:01:58 UTC