Re: Artifacts in Requesters -- Simple Conventions for Diagrams
mozilla rdf xul <-> rdf query convertor
Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics - Oct 31, 2002 telecon
xinclude
Status of entries in edtodo
WOWG membership by org
[MTF] WS Management Architecture Conceprs @ 26 Sep 2002
Re: draft-kindberg-tag-uri
Test message
15" NEC LCDs: 1550V vs 1545V?
suggested reading on RDF and the Semantic Web
foaf nick list
Review copies of RDF Concepts WD
reification examples
Re: request for feedback on domain and range semantics.
RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
2002-10-25 revision of RDF concepts
Re: weekly call for agenda items
Relinquishing RDF-concepts document lock
Passes pubrules etc.
[Fwd: OWL draft]
RDF-concepts, 2002-10-18
Lbase doc for review
Undapted concepts
Re: Starting on the HTTP binding edits
archive approval system
archive approval system
Class='toc' in HTML
http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-concepts/2002-10-10/rdf-conce pts.html
Re: IMPORTANT: your message to www-annotation
Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
Issue 353 closed, Edtoto.html updated <eom>
Consensus on semantic layering
attendees at WebOnt face to face 4 (archival copy)
Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Re: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Re: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Re: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
Editor's TODO list
- Re: Editor's TODO list
- Re: Editor's TODO list
- RE: Editor's TODO list
- Re: Editor's TODO list
- RE: Editor's TODO list
- RE: Editor's TODO list
- RE: Editor's TODO list