Friday, 1 November 2002
- Re: Artifacts in Requesters -- Simple Conventions for Diagrams
- mozilla rdf xul <-> rdf query convertor
Thursday, 31 October 2002
- Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics - Oct 31, 2002 telecon
- xinclude
- RE: Status of entries in edtodo
- Re: Status of entries in edtodo
- Status of entries in edtodo
- Re: WOWG membership by org
- WOWG membership by org
Wednesday, 30 October 2002
Thursday, 26 September 2002
Tuesday, 29 October 2002
Monday, 28 October 2002
- suggested reading on RDF and the Semantic Web
- Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
Sunday, 27 October 2002
Saturday, 26 October 2002
Friday, 25 October 2002
- reification examples
- RE: request for feedback on domain and range semantics.
- Re: request for feedback on domain and range semantics.
- RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
- 2002-10-25 revision of RDF concepts
Thursday, 24 October 2002
- Re: archive approval system
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: archive approval system
- Re: archive approval system
- Re: archive approval system
- Re: IMPORTANT: your message to www-annotation
- Re: archive approval system
Wednesday, 23 October 2002
Tuesday, 22 October 2002
Monday, 21 October 2002
Friday, 18 October 2002
Thursday, 17 October 2002
Tuesday, 15 October 2002
- Re: Starting on the HTTP binding edits
- Re: Starting on the HTTP binding edits
- Re: Starting on the HTTP binding edits
Saturday, 12 October 2002
Friday, 11 October 2002
Thursday, 10 October 2002
- Class='toc' in HTML
- http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-concepts/2002-10-10/rdf-conce pts.html
- Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- RE: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- RE: Editor's TODO list
- RE: Editor's TODO list
- Re: IMPORTANT: your message to www-annotation
- Re: Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
- Proposal for new last call issue: Some unprocessed headers should stay
Wednesday, 9 October 2002
Tuesday, 8 October 2002
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Re: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Issue 353 closed, Edtoto.html updated <eom>
- Re: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Re: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
Sunday, 8 September 2002
Monday, 7 October 2002
- attendees at WebOnt face to face 4 (archival copy)
- RE: Editor's TODO list
- Re: Editor's TODO list
- Re: Editor's TODO list
- RE: Editor's TODO list
- Re: Editor's TODO list
Saturday, 5 October 2002
Friday, 4 October 2002
- RE: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Re: Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Question on section 2.7.1, Part 1
- Re: Editor's TODO list
- Editor's TODO list
Thursday, 3 October 2002
- Re: TEST: N3->otter as a test implementation [was: OWL semantics]
- Possible WS diagrams (resent)
- Possible WS diagrams
- archival copy of "Layering RDFS into OWL"