- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 01 Oct 2002 12:10:20 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, www-archive@w3.org
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 11:38, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Hmmmm. > > Dan - > > the quotes inside quotes problem here seems to be arising because of a > mismatch between what Jena does and what cwm does. > > The description in question as an xhtml <code> element. Using the C14N view > of an XML Literal Jena sticks in the namespace decl xmlns="....xhtml..." > with the " preferred by XC14N. > > Fixes could be: > - hack Jena to use ' instead of " > - fix cwm to accept " inside " cwm already supports it: <#z> <#prop> "string with \" escaped quote marks". -- http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/strquot.n3 You can't put an unescaped newline inside a "-delimited string, keep in mind. > > The hack on Jena would not be acceptable in a shipping Jena, but I am in > fact processing the OWL test cases with a special so I can hack it > independently. > > Jeremy > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:45 PM > > To: jjc@hpl.hp.com > > Cc: www-archive@w3.org > > Subject: TEST: /2002/03owlt/intersectionOf > > > > > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > just a quick one in between... > > using Jena as > > java -cp /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/WEB-INF/lib/jena.jar; > > /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/WEB-INF/lib/xerces.jar; > > /w3ccvs/WWW/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/WEB-INF/lib/icu4j.jar > > jena.rdfcopy %1 RDF/XML N3 > > we are quite happy to have the testcases in N3 > > e.g > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/intersectionOf/premises001.n3 > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/intersectionOf/conclusions001.n3 > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/intersectionOf/Manifest001.n3 > > > > it's just that in the latter we (and cwm as well I see) > > had some trouble with quotes-inside-quotes of of the > > testSchema#description literal > > > > therefore I made the manual change into what N3 > > normally uses for such cases i.e. """ > > > > I have no problem (appart from a too long proof at > > our side) with your N3 production > > > > -- , > > Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ > > > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2002 23:29:17 UTC