public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org from April 2005 by subject

[Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM: [Fwd: Last Call Comment (soap) - Binding fault [detail] in SOAP 1.1 envelope]]

[Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM: [Fwd: Last call comment (soap): Normative text for fault properties binding]]

[children] inconsistency (Core, editorial)

[Editorial][Core] Bad URL's

[Editorial][Core] Example 3-1

[Editorial][Core] Order of items in section 3 and 3.1

[Editorial][Core] S11 in Table 1-1

[Editorial][Core] Section 3.2

[Editorial][Core] Section 4

[Editorial][Core] Table 3-1

Allow dispatch on more than [destination] and [action] (Core, clarification)

Allowance of Migration Contracts for WS-addressing conformant endpoints

Anonymous and [destination] over-constrained (Core, substantive)

Anonymous not limited to replies (Core, editorial)

Binding rules don't appear to allow optional headers (SOAP, clarification)

Clarify [destination] comparison (Core, clarification)

Clarify Anonymous URI and for the case of HTTP responses (Core substantive)

Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive)

Clarify distinction between XML Infoset representation and SOAP headers (SOAP, clarification)

Clarify Invalid Message Addressing Property and Message Property Required Faults (SOAP, substantive)

Clarify which fault if SOAP Action and wsa:Action don't match (SOAP, substantive)

Clearer wording for Section 2.1 (Core, editorial)

Clearer wording for Table 3-1 (Core, editorial)

Disallow multiple "reply" relationships (Core, clarification)

Disambiguate the Conformance statements in WS-A SOAP Binding specification

Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive)

Editorial: Wording clarifications in Core Section 4

EIIs have QNames? (Core, editorial)

entire route in ws-addressing

Feedback on xs:nonNegativeInteger (SOAP, clarification)

Formal definition of wsa:isReferenceParameter (SOAP, clarification)

Fwd: [Editorial][SOAP] Bad URL's

Fwd: [Editorial][SOAP] IRI for SOAP 1.2 Module and SOAP 1.1 Extension

Fwd: [Editorial][SOAP] MessageId vs MessageID

Fwd: [Editorial][SOAP] order of items in section 2.3

Fwd: [Editorial][SOAP] Section 5

Fwd: [Editorial][xsd] typo in xsd

Fwd: Last call issue with ReplyTo and security

Fwd: Last call issue with section 3.0: why does this spec mandate a dispatching model?

Fwd: Rationalize URI vs. IRI (Core, clarification)

Header extensibility processing model (Core, substantive)

Intermediary Processing

introduction of MAP and MEP terms

Last Call (Core): Editorial Comments

Last Call Comment (Core): Endpoint Reference not properly defined in section 2.2

Last Call Comment (Core): Utility of [source endpoint] property not clear

Last Call Comment (Core): WS-Addressing restricted to XML 1.0 or not?

Last call issue with ReplyTo and security

Last call issue with section 3.0: why does this spec mandate a dispatching model?

LC10 - EIIs have QNames

lc21: Anonymous and [destination] over-constrained

LC31 wsa:IsReferenceParameter clashes

LC9 - Reinforce absolute IRIs

Merge Core and SOAP Binding specs (SOAP, substantive)

Missing xml namespace prefix declaration (SOAP, editorial)

Mixed notation and indirect terminology for MAPs (SOAP, clarification)

More Security Considerations (SOAP, substantive)

Note effect of wsa:IsReferenceParameter on validation (SOAP, clarification)

Question regarding cardinality of [destination]

Rationalize URI vs. IRI (Core, clarification)

Rationalize URI vs. IRI (Core, clarification) lc23

Ref param data encoding (Core, clarification)

Ref param opacity (Core, clarification)

Reinforce absolute IRIs (Core, clarification)

Resolution for WS-Addressing LC issue 18 - proposal accepted

Resolution of issue LC19

Resolution of LC27

SOAP Binding & Core: Interaction between Faults and [message id] and [reply endpoint] etc.

Typographic nits (Core, editorial)

Typographical nits (SOAP, editorial)

Typographical nits (SOAP, editorial) (correction)

WS-Addressing - Closing Last Call Issue 12

wsa:IsReferenceParameter clashes (SOAP, substantive)

wsa:isReferenceParameter inconsistent casing (SOAP, clarification)

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2005 17:59:15 UTC