- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:12:32 -0700
- To: <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>
The primary definition of the WS-A properties is in the Core, using the [property] notation, not in the SOAP Feature which assigns each of these properties a URI. The notation in Section 3.3 below mixes these two notations in referring to WS-A properties. Since the [property] notation is primary, we suggest referring to the primary definition directly and using the [property] notation. The notation also refers to these properties as SOAP 1.2 WS-Addressing 1.0 Feature properties instead of WS-Addressing 1.0 Message Addressing Properties, which exhibits the same problem of unnecessary levels of indirection. Change the following sentence: 'When a message is to be addressed to an endpoint, the values of the SOAP 1.2 WS-Addressing 1.0 Feature properties are mapped to the message as SOAP header blocks with the following additional modifications:' to read (also incorporating the changes requested at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-comments/2005Ap r/0026.html): 'When a message is to be addressed to an endpoint, the XML representation of each non-empty WS-Addressing 1.0 Message Addressing Property is inserted into the message as a SOAP header block subject to the following additional constraints:' Change the first bullet in Section 3.3, which states: 'The value of the http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/feature/ReferenceParameters property is added to the SOAP message header.' to read: 'The value of the [reference parameters] property is added to the SOAP message header.' Change the third bullet in Section 3.3, which states: 'Each property that is of type IRI MUST be serialized as an absolute IRI in the SOAP message.' to read (also incorporating the changes requested at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-comments/2005Ap r/0026.html): 'Each property that is of type IRI MUST be serialized as an absolute IRI in the corresponding XML Infoset representation of that Message Addressing Property.'
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 21:12:44 UTC