public-webrtc@w3.org from December 2014 by date

Tuesday, 30 December 2014

• (Re|de)fining the identity provider sandbox Martin Thomson
• Re: No way to set voiceActivityDetection when callee Peter Thatcher
• Re: No way to set voiceActivityDetection when callee Iñaki Baz Castillo

Monday, 29 December 2014

• Re: No way to set voiceActivityDetection when callee Peter Thatcher
• Renaming RTCIceTransports to RTCIceTransportPolicy Peter Thatcher
• Proposal for RTCRtcpMuxPolicy Peter Thatcher
• No way to set voiceActivityDetection when callee Iñaki Baz Castillo

Saturday, 27 December 2014

• Re: onicegatheringstatechange VS onicecandidate with candidate==null (just one of them, please) Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: onicegatheringstatechange VS onicecandidate with candidate==null (just one of them, please) Eric Rescorla
• onicegatheringstatechange VS onicecandidate with candidate==null (just one of them, please) Iñaki Baz Castillo

Thursday, 25 December 2014

• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Ryan Sleevi

Wednesday, 24 December 2014

• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto tim panton
• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Eric Rescorla
• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Martin Thomson

Tuesday, 23 December 2014

• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Ryan Sleevi
• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Martin Thomson
• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Ryan Sleevi
• Re: WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Richard Barnes
• WebRTC Certificate Management - a plea to NOT use Web Crypto Ryan Sleevi

Friday, 19 December 2014

• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Harald Alvestrand
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Singh Varun
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Peter Thatcher
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? piranna@gmail.com
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Stefan Håkansson LK

Thursday, 18 December 2014

• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Peter Thatcher
• Re: per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• per-DataChannel stats: on PeerConnection or on DataChannel? Peter Thatcher
• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Tuesday, 16 December 2014

• Adopting the new W3C process for WebRTC WG Stefan Håkansson LK

Monday, 15 December 2014

• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Stefan Håkansson LK
• [Bug 27211] Add BundlePolicy to RTCConfiguration bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25513] WebRTC spec should explicitly specify all causes of a PeerConnection-sourced track being muted bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27226] Codec capabilities need to be accessible on an RTPSender bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25834] close is synchronous & idempotent bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22441] Bug in section 8.1.2 Requesting Assertions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25596] updateIce should be called setConfiguration bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25833] change the definition of "enqueue a task" as EKR slides May 20 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27213] DTMFSender should hang off RTCRTPSender, not MediaStreamTrack bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25836] add note about addtrack being async bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 19729] missing a reference for XMLHttpRequest in 4.1 Introduction bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21880] Certificate management is underspecified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25834] close is synchronous & idempotent bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25835] when closing, all outstanding actions are cancelled and their callbacks are fired with a "cancelled" error bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21879] Unable to access certificate information in the API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20816] "Hold" unspecified bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23919] DataChannel.onerror callback needs an error argument specified. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26027] addIceCandidate should not be callable when PeerConnection is closed bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25102] RTCDataChannel::send() steps are not proper. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26644] MID in Candidate event attributes bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20809] Stream rejection not possible bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27226] Codec capabilities need to be accessible on an RTPSender bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27225] Encoding Parameters need to be added to RTPSender object bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27224] Transport objects should be added to the specification bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27213] DTMFSender should hang off RTCRTPSender, not MediaStreamTrack bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21086] getLocalStreams and getRemoteStreams should return empty sequence after Peerconnection::close bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25497] RTCRtpSender / Receiver objects need to be added to the specification bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25808] add new acces for the active remote/local SDP bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 20806] Section 15 (Security Considerations) is empty bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27227] New feature: Track swapping bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27225] Encoding Parameters need to be added to RTPSender object bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25828] Need to add pc.canTrickle) bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27214] ICE gathering state change should surface an event bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 22442] Bug in section 8.1.3 Verifying Assertions bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25856] Add way to find out if a MST is isolated or becomes isolated bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25957] PeerConnection should have an onerror event handler bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 26279] Options attribute is required for createAnswer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25440] MediaStreamTrack.readyState has no muted attribute bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25533] WebRTC spec should explicitly specify the state transition for cancelled offers. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21086] getLocalStreams and getRemoteStreams should return empty sequence after Peerconnection::close bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 27224] Transport objects should be added to the specification bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21877] API is unable to handle inbound streams prior to arrival of answer bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 23920] TURN authentication failures should be surfaced as some event bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25859] Streams that become isolated generate errors on PC bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 25806] ice pool size bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 21879] Unable to access certificate information in the API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Sunday, 14 December 2014

• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Martin Thomson
• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Adam Bergkvist
• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Adam Bergkvist
• Re: WebRTC Security Assessment Eric Rescorla

Saturday, 13 December 2014

• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Martin Thomson
• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Iñaki Baz Castillo

Friday, 12 December 2014

• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Martin Thomson
• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
• Re: pc.localDescription sync/async issue Benjamin Schwartz
• pc.localDescription sync/async issue Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Tuesday, 9 December 2014

• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Martin Thomson
• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Monday, 8 December 2014

• InvalidParameter Jan-Ivar Bruaroey

Saturday, 6 December 2014

• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Harald Alvestrand

Friday, 5 December 2014

• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Martin Thomson
• New webrtc-pc Editor's draft (v20141205) Adam Bergkvist
• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Singh Varun
• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Martin Thomson
• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

Thursday, 4 December 2014

• Re: Reducing normative dependencies Martin Thomson
• Reducing normative dependencies Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: W3C has a new process, should we adopt it? Stefan Håkansson LK

Wednesday, 3 December 2014

• Re: W3C has a new process, should we adopt it? Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: W3C has a new process, should we adopt it? Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: W3C has a new process, should we adopt it? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: W3C has a new process, should we adopt it? Martin Thomson
• W3C has a new process, should we adopt it? Stefan Håkansson LK

Tuesday, 2 December 2014

• Re: Doohickey vs. MediaStream confusion Adam Bergkvist
• Doohickey vs. MediaStream confusion Stefan Håkansson LK

Monday, 1 December 2014

• Re: What to do with unsignaled media Martin Thomson
• RE: What to do with unsignaled media Bernard Aboba
• What to do with unsignaled media Martin Thomson

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 December 2014 18:47:51 UTC