Re: W3C has a new process, should we adopt it?

• From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
• Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:34:36 +0100
• To: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Cc: "Stefan Håkansson LK" <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4d0f27a607abddb6bf0ac7f785f72525.squirrel@webmail-mit.w3.org>

> On 3 December 2014 at 07:56, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> We think the new process is an improvement; its main drawback is
>> that W3C as a community has less experience with it (obviously).
>
>
> Having a Last Call state on a document has always seemed artificial.
> I would assume that you would still intend to have a last call of some
> sort, but have that a "soft state", rather than something informal.

Correct; in particular, we can solicit reviews from relevant parties at
different times, depending on the expected stability of the sections of
the document we want them to review.

Dom

Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 21:34:44 UTC