- Re: [webrtc-svc] L3T1_KEY is missing from the table, but not the diagram section (#81) henbos via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] L3T1_KEY is missing from the table, but not the diagram section (#81) Bernard Aboba via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] L3T1_KEY is missing from the table, but not the diagram section (#81) DanilChapovalov via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] L3T1_KEY is missing from the table, but not the diagram section (#81) Bernard Aboba via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
- Closed: [webrtc-svc] L3T1_KEY is missing from the table, but not the diagram section (#81) Bernard Aboba via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Sun Shin via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Varun Singh via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Bernard Aboba via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) pes10k via GitHub (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Sun Shin via GitHub (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Saturday, 11 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Sun Shin via GitHub (Thursday, 16 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Sun Shin via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Sun Shin via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Sun Shin via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) pes10k via GitHub (Sunday, 26 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) henbos via GitHub (Monday, 27 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) pes10k via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Expose powerEfficientEncoder/Decoder if MediaCapabilities allows it (#732) Sun Shin via GitHub (Tuesday, 28 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Detecting user-actionable camera issues (e.g., camera shutters) (#930) Elad Alon via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Detecting user-actionable camera issues (e.g., camera shutters) (#930) Elad Alon via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Detecting user-actionable camera issues (e.g., camera shutters) (#930) youennf via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Detecting user-actionable camera issues (e.g., camera shutters) (#930) Elad Alon via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Detecting user-actionable camera issues (e.g., camera shutters) (#930) youennf via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Detecting user-actionable camera issues (e.g., camera shutters) (#930) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Detecting user-actionable camera issues (e.g., camera shutters) (#930) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) Florent Castelli via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) henbos via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) Evan Shrubsole via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) henbos via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) Evan Shrubsole via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) henbos via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) Bernard Aboba via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) henbos via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] scalabilityMode: Same as in getParameters() or not? (#731) henbos via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) Andreas Pehrson via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) youennf via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) handellm via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) youennf via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) handellm via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) henbos via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) Andreas Pehrson via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) Andreas Pehrson via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) handellm via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) shangl via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) handellm via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Add keyframe interval support. (#216) youennf via GitHub (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) henbos via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) henbos via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) Johannes Kron via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) Philipp Hancke via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) henbos via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) Varun Singh via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) henbos via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] The HW exposure check does not solve Cloud Gaming use cases (#730) pes10k via GitHub (Friday, 10 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Philipp Hancke via GitHub (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Philipp Hancke via GitHub (Wednesday, 1 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Philipp Hancke via GitHub (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Harald Alvestrand via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Philipp Hancke via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Why is RTCIceCandidatePairStats.totalRoundTripTime mandatory to implement, but not responsesReceived? (#2819) Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2023 19:40:00 UTC