W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > February 2023

Re: [mediacapture-handle] Should the handle be an object? (#68)

From: Elad Alon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:51:18 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1428068878-1676299876-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> I sense generally good agreement on the use case here, with the only differences being over API shape.

I think there are multiple use cases here, and we only have agreement on some. It may be that the use-cases where we disagree are appear uninteresting to you, but they're important to me, so I disagree with the characterization of "general agreement".

To clarify, we disagree on:

* Communicating potential CropTargets to an unknown capturer.
* Communicating suggested [content hints](https://www.w3.org/TR/mst-content-hint/) to an unknown capturer.

I intend to get back to this topic (future reshuffles of duties and priorities notwithstanding). When that happens, if you still find these uninteresting, to the point of objecting to tackling the problem, then I don't see a way forward for me other than to fork the document and proceed with other interested parties. If you can think of a nicer way forward, please do share it.

GitHub Notification of comment by eladalon1983
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-handle/issues/68#issuecomment-1428068878 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 13 February 2023 14:51:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:20:00 UTC