[mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder specification expects to synchronously know the list of supported mime types (#202)
[webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] RTP Header Extension Encryption (#47)
[mst-content-hint] Abstract: less jargon? (#45)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
[mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
[webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Update footer of the charter
[mst-content-hint] Wide review (#44)
[webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Add links to MAUR & RAUR
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: editorial: s/signalling/signaling/
[webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Acknowledge possible work on Real-Time Text
- Re: [webrtc-charter] Acknowledge possible work on Real-Time Text (#58)
- Re: [webrtc-charter] Acknowledge possible work on Real-Time Text (#58)
[webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Add clause to allow transition to Patent Policy 2020
[webrtc-insertable-streams] Pull Request: E2e framing
[mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Fix build warnings
[mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
Re: [webrtc-extensions] Allow more control over playoutDelay behavior (#28)
[mediacapture-image] Use required keyword in get-only dictionaries where appropriate. (#239)
- Closed: [mediacapture-image] Use required keyword in get-only dictionaries where appropriate. (#239)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Use required keyword in get-only dictionaries where appropriate. (#239)
[mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Change MediaSettingsRange & PhotoCapabilities interfaces to dictionaries
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Change MediaSettingsRange & PhotoCapabilities interfaces to dictionaries (#238)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Change MediaSettingsRange & PhotoCapabilities interfaces to dictionaries (#238)
[mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
Closed: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
[mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by alvestrand
[mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by alvestrand
Closed: [mediacapture-output] Where did "speaker" feature policy go? (#91)
[mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-pc] "Make tidy" is missing (#2558)
[mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Identify the list of allowed required constraints for getUserMedia
Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia can be used to detect capabilities without permissions (#697)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia can be used to detect capabilities without permissions (#697)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] getUserMedia can be used to detect capabilities without permissions (#697)
[mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
Re: [mediacapture-image] Document OverConstrainedError for PTZ in explainer (#229)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Document OverConstrainedError for PTZ in explainer (#229)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Document OverConstrainedError for PTZ in explainer (#229)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Document OverConstrainedError for PTZ in explainer (#229)
[webrtc-stats] Pull Request: clarify roundtriptimemeasurements
- Re: [webrtc-stats] clarify roundtriptimemeasurements (#576)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] clarify roundtriptimemeasurements (#576)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] clarify roundtriptimemeasurements (#576)
[webrtc-ice] Pull Request: Fix IDL errors (mainly RTCIceParameters)
[mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Reject applyConstraints if page is not visible for PTZ
Closed: [mediacapture-record] Ability to specify constant bit rate encoding in MediaRecorder options. (#183)
Re: [mediacapture-record] Add `audioConstantBitRate` flag to `MediaRecorderOptions`. (#185)
Re: [webrtc-stats] add a graph showing the relationship of stats to the spec (#348)
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Update to latest ReSpec version
Re: [webrtc-pc] How to handle removing and re-adding remote streams/tracks - possible ID collisions? (#1562)
[mediacapture-image] Reject applyConstraints with SecurityError if page is not visible for PTZ (#236)
Re: [webrtc-extensions] The naming of playoutDelayHint (#20)
[webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] How does a developer decide on a value for `playoutDelay` ? (#46)
[mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
[mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Fix nits in JS example
[mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Clarify label may have no identifying info.
[mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add note about mappings of scalability modes to AV1 (#40)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
[mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder : frame loss on mobile devices (#201)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder : frame loss on mobile devices (#201)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder : frame loss on mobile devices (#201)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder : frame loss on mobile devices (#201)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] MediaRecorder : frame loss on mobile devices (#201)
Re: [mediacapture-record] Ability to tell MediaRecorder to maximize frame rate (#177)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Ability to tell MediaRecorder to maximize frame rate (#177)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Ability to tell MediaRecorder to maximize frame rate (#177)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Ability to tell MediaRecorder to maximize frame rate (#177)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Ability to tell MediaRecorder to maximize frame rate (#177)
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Scalability Mode Table revision
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Fix images height and remove legacy images
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Fix images height and remove legacy images (#38)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Fix images height and remove legacy images (#38)
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] Pull Request: Add and overwrite images for all structures
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add and overwrite images for all structures (#37)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add and overwrite images for all structures (#37)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Add and overwrite images for all structures (#37)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Do not allow DNS candidates in "relay" mode (#2533)
[mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Fix link for toJSON() in MediaDeviceInfo
[mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
[mediacapture-image] Pull Request: Add toJSON() for MediaSettingsRange
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Add toJSON() for MediaSettingsRange (#234)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Add toJSON() for MediaSettingsRange (#234)
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
Re: [mediacapture-output] Should the spec define specific static audio output device IDs (#93)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Use of icecandidateerror in port scanning (#2426)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Add portscanning warning to the spec (#2518)
[webrtc-extensions] When is negotiation complete? (#45)
[webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: API to explicit MID ordering (#44)
[mediacapture-output] Pull Request: Add support for PR preview
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Do not allow DNS candidates in "relay" mode (#2533)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Describe what happens with administratively prohibited candidates (#2531)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Allow adminstrative rejection of candidates (#2534)
Closed: [webrtc-svc] Browser/SFU capability negotiation (#34)
[webrtc-svc] new commits pushed by aboba
[mediacapture-output] Add preview generation to PRs (#97)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Follow-up to set variables outside queued task when handling ICE state and candidate pair changes in the same task (#2454)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand
Closed: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
[webrtc-pc] What happens if you make values undefined in setParameters? (#2556)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Spec says scaleResolutionDownBy must default to 1, but browsers differ (#2535)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] How to truncate simulcast layers? (#2537)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Does a PC depend on the page context? (#2516)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand
[mediacapture-output] Pull Request: Add Permissions policy section & integrate with permissions.
[webrtc-charter] Pull Request: Update based on new timeline towards the AC review
[mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Rename Feature Policy section (editorial)
Re: [webrtc-pc] `getCapabilities` seems to leak hardware capabilities w/o a permission (#2460)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Test coverage chapter 8: Statistics model (#2466)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Follow-up to set variables outside queued task when handling ICE state and candidate pair changes in the same task (#2454)
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Stop transports that are no longer used and fire events.
Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens to stopped transports? (#2486)
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Default scaleResolutionDownBy to 4:2:1 and drop last layers
Re: [webrtc-pc] How to truncate simulcast layers? (#2537)
[webrtc-pc] Make WebRTC usable as a backend for Service Workers to fulfill requests from a peer-to-peer network (#2553)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Make WebRTC usable as a backend for Service Workers to fulfill requests from a peer-to-peer network (#2553)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Make WebRTC usable as a backend for Service Workers to fulfill requests from a peer-to-peer network (#2553)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Make WebRTC usable as a backend for Service Workers to fulfill requests from a peer-to-peer network (#2553)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Make WebRTC usable as a backend for Service Workers to fulfill requests from a peer-to-peer network (#2553)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add support for WebRTC Data Channel in Workers (#230)
[webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
- Closed: [webrtc-svc] Confusing names for KEY and KEY_SHIFT structures (#36)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by dontcallmedom
Re: [mediacapture-record] Describe more precisely the handling of disabled tracks (#199)
Re: [mediacapture-output] Where did "speaker" feature policy go? (#91)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Where did "speaker" feature policy go? (#91)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Where did "speaker" feature policy go? (#91)
Re: [mediacapture-main] Should enumerateDevices by default return an empty list? (#646)
Closed: [mediacapture-image] Include malicious sites and surveillance cameras in the PTZ explainer (#222)
Re: [mediacapture-image] Include malicious sites and surveillance cameras in the PTZ explainer (#222)
[mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
[mediacapture-image] new commits pushed by riju
Re: [mediacapture-image] Add fingerprinting section to PTZ explainer (#231)
Re: [webrtc-svc] `getCapabilities` seems to leak hardware capabilities w/o a permission (#22)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] `getCapabilities` seems to leak hardware capabilities w/o a permission (#22)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] `getCapabilities` seems to leak hardware capabilities w/o a permission (#22)
[webrtc-ice] IDL errors in spec (#35)
Re: [mediacapture-output] Add Feature Policy section & integrate with permissions. (#90)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Add Feature Policy section & integrate with permissions. (#90)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Add Feature Policy section & integrate with permissions. (#90)
[mediacapture-output] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
Re: [mediacapture-main] Expose the type of device in MediaDeviceInfo (#698)
Closed: [mediacapture-main] What happens when a machine suspends? (#668)
[mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by henbos
[mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by henbos
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Is there an API to set DTLS-SRTP protection profile in js? (#2551)
Re: [webrtc-pc] Is there an API to set DTLS-SRTP protection profile in js? (#2551)
Re: [mediacapture-record] Fingerprint surface coming from MediaRecorder-able types - needs consideration? (#142)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCAudioReceiverStats and RTCAudioSenderStats aren't MTI (#2458)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Remove MTI marker from unimplemented MTI stats (#2497)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] Section 8.6 Mandatory To Implement Stats (#2484)
Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceCandidatePairStats.priority is listed as MTI but is obsolete (#2457)
[webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
Closed: [webrtc-svc] Make it clear that scalabilityMode is case-sensitive (#32)
Re: [webrtc-svc] Browser/SFU negotiation (#35)
Re: [webrtc-stats] framesEncoded exists only for video? (#573)
Re: [mediacapture-output] API to request audio output device selection (#86)
[mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec should provide algorithms to expose individual devices via enumerateDevices (#703)
Closed: [mediacapture-image] Update spec to new IDL syntax for optional dictionaries (#214)
Re: [mediacapture-image] Update spec to new IDL syntax for optional dictionaries (#214)
Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Tie MediaStreamTrack lifetime to the underlying AudioTrack or VideoTrack? (#24)
[webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Close peer connections (modulo firing ended) on page unload.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Close peer connections (modulo firing ended) on page unload. (#2552)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Close peer connections (modulo firing ended) on page unload. (#2552)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Close peer connections (modulo firing ended) on page unload. (#2552)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Close peer connections (modulo firing ended) on page unload. (#2552)
Re: [webrtc-insertable-streams] Insertable MediaStreams in chrome issues (#38)
Re: [webrtc-extensions] Mixed-codec simulcast proposal (#43)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Mixed-codec simulcast proposal (#43)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Mixed-codec simulcast proposal (#43)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Mixed-codec simulcast proposal (#43)
[mediacapture-fromelement] Make requestFrame() observable as a Promise resolving with frame metadata (#86)
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Make requestFrame() observable as a Promise resolving with frame metadata (#86)
- Closed: [mediacapture-fromelement] Make requestFrame() observable as a Promise resolving with frame metadata (#86)
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Make requestFrame() observable as a Promise resolving with frame metadata (#86)
- Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Make requestFrame() observable as a Promise resolving with frame metadata (#86)
Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Improvements to Privacy & Security Considerations (#196)
Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Define behavior when a cycle is detected (#85)
Re: [mediacapture-fromelement] Specify when requestFrame() captures the canvas content (#28)
Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Only reveal labels of devices user has given permission to (#640)
[mediacapture-main] MediaStreamTrack resizeMode constraint is too vague to request specific strategy (#702)
Re: [mediacapture-record] Fingerprint surface coming from 'isTypeSupported' - needs consideration? (#142)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Fingerprint surface coming from 'isTypeSupported' - needs consideration? (#142)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Fingerprint surface coming from 'isTypeSupported' - needs consideration? (#142)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Fingerprint surface coming from 'isTypeSupported' - needs consideration? (#142)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Fingerprint surface coming from 'isTypeSupported' - needs consideration? (#142)