public-webevents@w3.org from January to March 2013 by author

Arthur Barstow

• Re: document.createTouch/document.createTouchList are useless without new TouchEvent() or event.initTouchEvent() (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Testing TouchList.item(too_big) returns null (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: document.createTouch/document.createTouchList are useless without new TouchEvent() or event.initTouchEvent() (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Testing TouchList.item(too_big) returns null (Thursday, 28 March)
• Testing TouchList.item(too_big) returns null (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: TouchList interface (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Monday, 18 March)
• Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Pointer Events; comment deadline March 19 (Thursday, 14 March)
• [article] Touch And Mouse,Together Again For The First Time (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: ACTION-101: Work with Doug and Rick on defining Touch Events mapping in the Web Events WG (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Thursday, 28 February)
• Fwd: Re: ACTION-101: Work with Doug and Rick on defining Touch Events mapping in the Web Events WG (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC (Sunday, 24 February)
• Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC (Friday, 22 February)
• RfC: LCWD of Pointer Events; comment deadline March 19 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Friday, 15 February)
• FYI: FPWD of IndieUI: Events 1.0 published (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [admin] Some tips on using Mercurial and dvcs.w3.org (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RfC: LCWD of Touch Events v1; comment deadline February 14 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Touch Events v1; deadline January 22 (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: ACTION-101: Work with Doug and Rick on defining Touch Events mapping in the Web Events WG (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Touch Events v1; deadline January 22 (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Thursday, 17 January)
• CfC: publish LCWD of Touch Events v1; deadline January 22 (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Meeting Canceled Re: Web Events Draft Agenda: 15 January 2013 call (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Web Events Draft Agenda: 15 January 2013 call (Sunday, 13 January)
• Re: [Touch events] identifiedTouch (Sunday, 13 January)
• CfC: Proposed Resolution for ISSUE-28; deadline January 14 (Monday, 7 January)
• CfC: Proposed Resolution for ISSUE-27; deadline January 14 (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: [Touch events] createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: [Touch events] identifiedTouch (was: createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array) (Saturday, 5 January)
• Re: [Touch events] createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array (Friday, 4 January)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 6 March)
• createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: [Touch events] createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: [Touch events] createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array (Friday, 4 January)

Cathy.Chan@nokia.com

• RE: Testing TouchList.item(too_big) returns null (Thursday, 28 March)
• RE: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC (Monday, 25 February)
• RE: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC (Friday, 22 February)
• TEv1 test cases updated (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Monday, 21 January)
• Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Touch events] identifiedTouch (was: createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array) (Friday, 4 January)

Chris Wilson

• Re: [article] Touch And Mouse,Together Again For The First Time (Thursday, 14 March)

Dimitri Glazkov

• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 6 March)

Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

• document.createTouch/document.createTouchList are useless without new TouchEvent() or event.initTouchEvent() (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 6 March)

Matt Brubeck

• Re: Testing TouchList.item(too_big) returns null (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: document.createTouch/document.createTouchList are useless without new TouchEvent() or event.initTouchEvent() (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: document.createTouch/document.createTouchList are useless without new TouchEvent() or event.initTouchEvent() (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Testing TouchList.item(too_big) returns null (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: CfC: Proposed Resolution for ISSUE-27; deadline January 14 (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: CfC: Proposed Resolution for ISSUE-28; deadline January 14 (Monday, 7 January)

Michael Cooper

• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Thursday, 28 February)
• PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version (Wednesday, 13 February)

Ms2ger

• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Monday, 18 March)
• TouchList interface (Sunday, 17 March)

Olli Pettay

• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Monday, 18 March)

Rick Byers

• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Re: ACTION-101: Work with Doug and Rick on defining Touch Events mapping in the Web Events WG (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: ACTION-101: Work with Doug and Rick on defining Touch Events mapping in the Web Events WG (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: CfC: Proposed Resolution for ISSUE-28; deadline January 14 (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: CfC: Proposed Resolution for ISSUE-27; deadline January 14 (Monday, 7 January)
• Re: [Touch events] identifiedTouch (was: createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array) (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: [Touch events] createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array (Friday, 4 January)

Sangwhan Moon

• Re: Testing TouchList.item(too_big) returns null (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Need test results against Jan 2013 Touch Events LC (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments on Touch Events v1 LCWD (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: [Touch events] identifiedTouch (was: createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: CfC: Proposed Resolution for ISSUE-27; deadline January 14 (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: [Touch events] createTouchList should probably take a sequence, not an IDL array (Tuesday, 8 January)

Scott González

• Re: Adding implementor's note about event targets? (Thursday, 21 March)

Web Events Working Group Issue Tracker

• WebEvents-ISSUE-28 (identifiedTouch): TouchEvents v1: should identfiedTouch method be removed from TouchList interface? [Touch Events v1 spec] (Monday, 7 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 March 2013 19:04:17 UTC