- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:03:42 -0400
- To: ext Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: public-webevents@w3.org
On 3/20/13 1:39 PM, ext Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/20/13 12:47 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Boris - I updated the spec per your requests [1], [2]. >> >> For the purposes of Last Call comment tracking, would you please review >> the changes and let us know if the changes are OK or not. > > The changes are mostly fine. > > The only one that's not is the change to item(). I think what you > want is more like this: > > returns the Touch at the specified index in the list or null if the > index is not less than the length of the list. Done. > and you want a separate bit of prose either in a section 4.3 or at > toplevel in section 4 that says: > > A TouchList object's supported property indices are the numbers in > the range 0 to one less than the length of the list. Done. > with bonus points for "supported property indices" linking to > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-supported-property-indices Reference to WebIDL added but not a direct link to that definition. The changeset is <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/rev/0edc668e7910>. > P.S. An editorial nit: "Return type: getter Touch" is pretty weird; I > assume that's being auto-generated by some software that's not > actually using a full-fledged WebIDL parser... Yeah, that's an artifact of ReSpec that I don't know how to fix but I'll make sure the "getter" is removed before the spec is copied to w3.org/TR/. Thanks Boris! -AB
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:04:10 UTC