- From: <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:58:07 +0000
- To: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, <public-webevents@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A46437648ECB3D4F852B077AFF9099F51C91E40F@008-AM1MPN1-062.mgdnok.nokia.com>
On 1/18/13 7:32 AM, Art Barstow wrote: > On 1/17/13 6:59 PM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote: > > On Jan 18, 2013, at 12:58 AM, Rick Byers wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> > wrote: > >> On 1/17/13 8:17 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> On 1/15/13 4:26 PM, ext Cathy.Chan@nokia.com wrote: > >> 3. The description of createTouchList says [[Creates a TouchList > >> object consisting of zero or more Touch objects.]] But the table > >> below says the touches attribute is not nullable. Is that a > >> contradiction? > >> What would be the expected behavior if we createTouchList() is called > >> with zero Touch objects? > >> Or should it be restricted to take one or more Touch objects? > >> > >> Matt, Olli, Boris - what does Gecko do here? > >> > >> Calling createTouchList with no arguments creates a list with no objects in > it and length 0. > >> > >> Same behavior in Chrome (i.e. upstream WebKit - iOS could be different > in theory). > > Same in Opera. > > Thanks for your prompt replies Boris, Rick and Sangwhan! > > Given this feedback, I propose the description of the variadic method change > from: > > [[ > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw- > file/v1/touchevents.html#methods-1> > > Creates a TouchList object consisting of zero or more Touch objects. > ]] > > to: > > [[ > Creates a TouchList object consisting of zero or more Touch objects. > Calling this method with no arguments creates a TouchList with no objects in > it and length 0. > ]] In that case, should the touches parameter be marked as Optional in the table following the description? > > Comments on the proposal are welcome, but please send them as soon as > possible and include a specific proposal that would satisfy/address your > proposal. In the absence of any comments, I will include this proposal in LC#2. > > Cathy - is there a test case(s) for this variadic method? This can be easily added. I'll see to it. - Cathy. > > -Thanks, AB > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 18:58:37 UTC