- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:25:15 -0500
- To: ext Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>
- CC: "public-webevents@w3.org WG" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Sangwhan - this is one of two comments that is blocking the progression of this spec to Proposed Recommendation [LC-comments]. Would you please either withdraw your comment or make a specific proposal by March 1? -Thanks, ArtB [LC-Comments] <http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-LCWD-24-Jan-2013> On 1/30/13 1:53 PM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote: > On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:39 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> On 1/30/13 12:17 AM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote: >>> Bumping Art's comment from another place. >>> >>> Since there has already been cases where implementations had issues with event targets >>> in multiple frame documents, I've been thinking about adding a explicit but non-normative >>> implementor's note about event targets since the spec has been re-opened. >>> >>> Ideas? >> Please make a specific proposal (including where you think it should be inserted in the spec) and is this a v1 and/or v2 proposal? > It should apply to both as it is a bit ambiguous at the moment, I'll write something more > specific and where it would probably belong best after giving it some thought. >
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 14:25:54 UTC